QQQX vs. TILIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX).
QQQX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. TILIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002.
Performance
QQQX vs. TILIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQQX vs. TILIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | -0.91% | 14.87% | 25.61% | 21.68% | -27.39% | 25.32% | 15.75% | 28.83% | -11.68% | 39.19% |
TILIX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -8.99% | 18.41% | 33.31% | 42.64% | -29.22% | 27.63% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.66% | 28.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQX achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly higher than TILIX's -8.99% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQX has underperformed TILIX with an annualized return of 11.88%, while TILIX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.62% annualized return.
QQQX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- 1Y
- 25.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
TILIX
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -4.02%
- YTD
- -8.99%
- 6M
- -8.65%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.54%
- 10Y*
- 16.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQQX vs. TILIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than TILIX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QQQX vs. TILIX — Risk / Return Rank
QQQX
TILIX
QQQX vs. TILIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 0.83 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 1.35 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.19 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 1.22 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.96 | 4.13 | +5.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.83 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.59 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.79 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.57 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQX and TILIX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QQQX vs. TILIX - Dividend Comparison
QQQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.30%, more than TILIX's 4.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | 8.30% | 7.85% | 6.73% | 7.26% | 9.66% | 5.85% | 6.00% | 6.49% | 8.40% | 5.95% | 7.54% | 7.23% |
TILIX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 4.85% | 4.41% | 3.25% | 1.90% | 11.00% | 8.76% | 1.91% | 2.38% | 4.01% | 0.68% | 1.33% | 1.32% |
Drawdowns
QQQX vs. TILIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQX drawdown since its inception was -57.25%, which is greater than TILIX's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQX and TILIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.25% | -50.54% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -16.24% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.33% | -32.68% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.96% | -32.68% | -3.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -12.34% | +11.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -7.77% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 4.79% | -2.18% |
Volatility
QQQX vs. TILIX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) at 6.80%. This indicates that QQQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQQX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 6.80% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 12.41% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.14% | 22.63% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 21.49% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 21.04% | +0.01% |