PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQX.TO vs. QQQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQX.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQX.TO achieves a 22.62% return, which is significantly lower than QQQT.TO's 29.42% return.


QQQX.TO

1D
-0.24%
1M
11.24%
YTD
22.62%
6M
19.00%
1Y
43.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQT.TO

1D
-1.76%
1M
12.73%
YTD
29.42%
6M
27.21%
1Y
62.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQX.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQX.TO
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF
22.62%14.55%20.80%
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
29.42%30.06%7.15%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQX.TO and QQQT.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024

0.85

The correlation between QQQX.TO and QQQT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQX.TO vs. QQQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQX.TO
QQQX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQT.TO
QQQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQX.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQX.TOQQQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.48

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

3.64

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

13.73

-2.29

QQQX.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQX.TO and QQQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQX.TOQQQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

2.92

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

1.42

+0.01

Drawdowns

QQQX.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQX.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.62%, smaller than the maximum QQQT.TO drawdown of -30.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQX.TO and QQQT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQX.TOQQQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.62%

-30.32%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

-17.37%

+5.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-1.87%

+1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-5.10%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

4.59%

-0.81%

Volatility

QQQX.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO) is 4.72%, while Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that QQQX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQX.TOQQQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

6.65%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

17.18%

-5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

21.68%

-5.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.72%

26.24%

-5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

26.24%

-5.52%

QQQX.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQX.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQT.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQX.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQQX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than QQQT.TO's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
0.23%0.30%0.38%0.25%
QQQX.TO
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF
0.29%0.35%0.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQX.TO and QQQT.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQX.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQX.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQQT.TO.

QQQX.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while QQQT.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQX.TO and 0.25% for QQQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQX.TO and QQQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer