PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQU vs. MVLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQU vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQU achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.


QQQU

1D
-2.40%
1M
4.02%
YTD
3.96%
6M
3.60%
1Y
60.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MVLL

1D
7.14%
1M
201.84%
YTD
842.68%
6M
558.01%
1Y
1,215.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQU vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQQU and MVLL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025

0.48

QQQU vs. MVLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQU
MVLL

Technology

15.8%
66.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%

-

Communication Services

10.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QQQU
15.8%
MVLL
66.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQU
10.7%
MVLL

-

Communication Services

QQQU
10.3%
MVLL

-

Basic Materials

QQQU

-

MVLL

-

Consumer Defensive

QQQU

-

MVLL

-

Energy

QQQU

-

MVLL

-

Financial Services

QQQU

-

MVLL

-

Healthcare

QQQU

-

MVLL

-

Industrials

QQQU

-

MVLL

-

Real Estate

QQQU

-

MVLL

-

Utilities

QQQU

-

MVLL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQU vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQU
QQQU Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
QQQU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQU Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQU Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

MVLL
MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQU vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQUMVLLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

9.23

-7.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.03

4.79

-2.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.63

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

25.11

-23.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.18

52.27

-47.09

QQQU vs. MVLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQU Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the MVLL Sharpe Ratio of 9.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQU and MVLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQUMVLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

9.23

-7.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

3.33

-2.36

Drawdowns

QQQU vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQU drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, smaller than the maximum MVLL drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQU and MVLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQUMVLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.70%

-59.02%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.29%

-48.93%

+12.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.14%

0.00%

-7.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-22.42%

+9.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.62%

23.46%

-11.84%

Volatility

QQQU vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) is 9.30%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 60.78%. This indicates that QQQU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQUMVLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.30%

60.78%

-51.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.20%

96.08%

-67.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.87%

133.11%

-93.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.99%

139.63%

-86.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.99%

139.63%

-86.64%

QQQU vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQU vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

QQQU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%, while MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
MVLL
GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQU
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares
9.23%9.62%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQU and MVLL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVLL has higher volatility (60.78%) compared to QQQU (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQU dropped -53.70% vs MVLL's -59.02%.

On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1215.17% vs 60.01% for QQQU. On fees, QQQU is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, QQQU has been the lower-risk option at 9.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1215.17% return vs 60.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQU is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

QQQU has the higher dividend yield at 9.23%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.

QQQU tracks The Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (200%), while MVLL tracks Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QQQU and 1.50% for MVLL.

MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.23 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQU and MVLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer