PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQT.TO vs. QQQX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQT.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQT.TO achieves a 31.74% return, which is significantly higher than QQQX.TO's 22.62% return.


QQQT.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
16.83%
YTD
31.74%
6M
29.48%
1Y
67.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQX.TO

1D
0.35%
1M
12.65%
YTD
22.62%
6M
18.97%
1Y
44.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQT.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
31.74%30.06%7.15%
QQQX.TO
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF
22.62%14.55%20.80%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQT.TO and QQQX.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024

0.85

The correlation between QQQT.TO and QQQX.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQT.TO vs. QQQX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQT.TO
QQQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQX.TO
QQQX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
QQQX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQT.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQT.TOQQQX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.12

2.79

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.82

3.69

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.49

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

3.70

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.64

11.92

+2.72

QQQT.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is comparable to the QQQX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQT.TO and QQQX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQT.TOQQQX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12

2.79

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

1.44

+0.02

Drawdowns

QQQT.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.32%, which is greater than QQQX.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT.TO and QQQX.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQT.TOQQQX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.32%

-22.62%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.37%

-12.18%

-5.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-3.97%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

3.78%

+0.81%

Volatility

QQQT.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO) at 4.77%. This indicates that QQQT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQT.TOQQQX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

4.77%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.09%

11.97%

+5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.61%

16.02%

+5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.23%

20.76%

+5.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.23%

20.76%

+5.47%

QQQT.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQT.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQX.TO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQT.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than QQQX.TO's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
0.23%0.30%0.38%0.25%
QQQX.TO
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF
0.29%0.35%0.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQT.TO and QQQX.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQX.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQX.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQQT.TO.

QQQT.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted Index, while QQQX.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQQT.TO and 0.15% for QQQX.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQT.TO and QQQX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer