QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO
QQQT.TO (Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged) and QMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQT.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted Index, while QMVP.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQT.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QMVP.TO.
Performance
QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QQQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 16.57%
- YTD
- 31.89%
- 6M
- 30.01%
- 1Y
- 69.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMVP.TO
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 16.23%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged | 31.86% |
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF | 26.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQT.TO and QMVP.TO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQT.TO
QMVP.TO
QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQT.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.21 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.90 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQT.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.46 | 4.29 | -2.83 |
Drawdowns
QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.32%, which is greater than QMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT.TO and QMVP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQT.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.32% | -12.77% | -17.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.11% | -3.90% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | — | — |
Volatility
QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQT.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.63% | 21.82% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.25% | 21.82% | +4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.25% | 21.82% | +4.43% |
QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQT.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QMVP.TO's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, more than QMVP.TO's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, QQQT.TO and QMVP.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQQT.TO.
QQQT.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QMVP.TO is Technology Equities. QQQT.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted Index, while QMVP.TO tracks Solactive Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Hamilton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQQT.TO and 0.19% for QMVP.TO.
Find the right allocation for QQQT.TO and QMVP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer