PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QQQT.TO

1D
0.98%
1M
16.57%
YTD
31.89%
6M
30.01%
1Y
69.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QMVP.TO

1D
0.32%
1M
16.23%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQQT.TO and QMVP.TO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQT.TO
QQQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

QMVP.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQT.TOQMVP.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.52

QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQT.TOQMVP.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.46

4.29

-2.83

Drawdowns

QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.32%, which is greater than QMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT.TO and QMVP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQT.TOQMVP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.32%

-12.77%

-17.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-3.90%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

Volatility

QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQT.TOQMVP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.63%

21.82%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.25%

21.82%

+4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.25%

21.82%

+4.43%

QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQT.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QMVP.TO's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQT.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, more than QMVP.TO's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QMVP.TO
Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF
0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
0.23%0.30%0.38%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, QQQT.TO and QMVP.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQQT.TO.

QQQT.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QMVP.TO is Technology Equities. QQQT.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted Index, while QMVP.TO tracks Solactive Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Hamilton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQQT.TO and 0.19% for QMVP.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQT.TO and QMVP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer