QQQT.TO vs. JEPQ.TO
QQQT.TO (Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged) and JEPQ.TO (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQT.TO is passively managed, while JEPQ.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, QQQT.TO returned 67.05% vs 31.41% for JEPQ.TO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQT.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.TO.
Performance
QQQT.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQT.TO achieves a 31.74% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ.TO's 11.09% return.
QQQT.TO
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 16.83%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 29.48%
- 1Y
- 67.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQT.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged | 31.74% | 30.06% | 1.88% |
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 11.09% | 10.46% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQT.TO and JEPQ.TO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between QQQT.TO and JEPQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQT.TO vs. JEPQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQT.TO
JEPQ.TO
QQQT.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQT.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.48 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 4.08 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.64 | 16.30 | -1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQT.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12 | 2.51 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 1.34 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
QQQT.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.32%, which is greater than JEPQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT.TO and JEPQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQT.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.32% | -20.05% | -10.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.37% | -7.74% | -9.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.40% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -3.36% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 1.93% | +2.66% |
Volatility
QQQT.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO) at 4.05%. This indicates that QQQT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQT.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | 4.05% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.09% | 9.88% | +7.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.61% | 12.58% | +9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.23% | 17.35% | +8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.23% | 17.35% | +8.88% |
QQQT.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQT.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQT.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than JEPQ.TO's 10.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 10.00% | 10.34% | 5.50% | 0.00% |
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQT.TO and JEPQ.TO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQT.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Evolve and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQQT.TO and 0.35% for JEPQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for QQQT.TO and JEPQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer