QQQT.TO vs. HXQ.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQQT.TO (Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged) and HXQ.TO (Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQQT.TO tracks the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted Index while HXQ.TO tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQQT.TO returned 67.05% vs 43.40% for HXQ.TO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

QQQT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQT.TO achieves a 31.74% return, which is significantly higher than HXQ.TO's 22.84% return.

QQQT.TO

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 16.83%
• YTD: 31.74%
• 6M: 29.48%
• 1Y: 67.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HXQ.TO

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 13.01%
• YTD: 22.84%
• 6M: 19.20%
• 1Y: 43.40%
• 3Y*: 30.08%
• 5Y*: 21.13%
• 10Y*: 22.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged	31.74%	30.06%	28.22%	15.37%
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF	22.84%	15.05%	35.98%	10.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQT.TO and HXQ.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.82

The correlation between QQQT.TO and HXQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQQT.TO vs. HXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQT.TO

QQQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
QQQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
QQQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
QQQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QQQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

HXQ.TO

HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 75
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQT.TO	HXQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.12	2.80	+0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	3.65	+0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.49	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	3.51	+0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.64	11.28	+3.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is comparable to the HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQT.TO and HXQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQT.TO	HXQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.12	2.80	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	1.08	+0.37

Drawdowns

QQQT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.32%, roughly equal to the maximum HXQ.TO drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT.TO and HXQ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQT.TO	HXQ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.32%	-31.60%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.37%	-12.43%	-4.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	0.00%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-5.75%	+0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.59%	3.86%	+0.73%

Volatility

QQQT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) at 4.63%. This indicates that QQQT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQT.TO	HXQ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.27%	4.63%	+1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.09%	11.81%	+5.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.61%	15.62%	+5.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.23%	20.76%	+5.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.23%	20.83%	+5.40%

QQQT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQT.TO and HXQ.TO have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQQT.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged	0.23%	0.30%	0.38%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQT.TO and HXQ.TO in my portfolio?

QQQT.TO and HXQ.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQQT.TO or HXQ.TO?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQT.TO or HXQ.TO?

QQQT.TO and HXQ.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between QQQT.TO and HXQ.TO?

QQQT.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted Index, while HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Horizons.