PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQT.TO vs. ENCL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQT.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQT.TO achieves a 31.89% return, which is significantly lower than ENCL.TO's 36.00% return.


QQQT.TO

1D
0.98%
1M
16.57%
YTD
31.89%
6M
30.01%
1Y
69.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ENCL.TO

1D
2.51%
1M
3.46%
YTD
36.00%
6M
33.46%
1Y
54.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQT.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
31.89%30.06%28.22%12.65%
ENCL.TO
Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD
36.00%14.97%20.32%-3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQT.TO and ENCL.TO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023

0.04

The correlation between QQQT.TO and ENCL.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQT.TO vs. ENCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQT.TO
QQQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ENCL.TO
ENCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ENCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQT.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) and Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQT.TOENCL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.21

3.06

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.90

3.75

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.52

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

5.20

-1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.52

18.68

-3.16

QQQT.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is comparable to the ENCL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQT.TO and ENCL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQT.TOENCL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21

3.06

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.46

1.26

+0.19

Drawdowns

QQQT.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.32%, which is greater than ENCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT.TO and ENCL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQT.TOENCL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.32%

-21.05%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.37%

-10.75%

-6.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.95%

+2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-3.95%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

2.99%

+1.60%

Volatility

QQQT.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) is 6.31%, while Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that QQQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQT.TOENCL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

7.34%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.09%

15.75%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.63%

17.78%

+3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.25%

20.17%

+6.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.25%

20.17%

+6.08%

QQQT.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQT.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCL.TO's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQT.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than ENCL.TO's 13.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ENCL.TO
Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD
13.41%17.14%18.56%4.68%
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
0.23%0.30%0.38%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQT.TO and ENCL.TO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQT.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.86% for ENCL.TO.

QQQT.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ENCL.TO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQQT.TO and 1.86% for ENCL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQT.TO and ENCL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer