PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQO.L vs. EQQS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQO.L vs. EQQS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) and Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QQQO.L is traded in GBp, while EQQS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EQQS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQO.L achieves a 15.53% return, which is significantly lower than EQQS.L's 20.20% return.


QQQO.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
6.84%
YTD
15.53%
6M
14.50%
1Y
33.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EQQS.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
9.51%
YTD
20.20%
6M
18.34%
1Y
41.77%
3Y*
24.99%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQO.L vs. EQQS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQO.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP
15.53%6.57%12.88%
EQQS.L
Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
20.20%11.31%16.48%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQO.L and EQQS.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024

0.65

The correlation between QQQO.L and EQQS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQO.L vs. EQQS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQO.L
QQQO.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQS.L
EQQS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EQQS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQO.L vs. EQQS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) and Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQO.LEQQS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.47

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

3.75

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.27

10.63

+0.65

QQQO.L vs. EQQS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the EQQS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQO.L and EQQS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQO.LEQQS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.65

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.94

+0.24

Drawdowns

QQQO.L vs. EQQS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQO.L drawdown since its inception was -21.70%, smaller than the maximum EQQS.L drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQO.L and EQQS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQO.LEQQS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.70%

-27.47%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.04%

-11.09%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.71%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-7.30%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.92%

-0.97%

Volatility

QQQO.L vs. EQQS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) is 3.90%, while Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that QQQO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQO.LEQQS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

4.83%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.93%

11.46%

-2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.00%

15.68%

-1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

21.54%

-4.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

21.62%

-4.28%

QQQO.L vs. EQQS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQO.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQS.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQO.L vs. EQQS.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.52%, while EQQS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
EQQS.L
Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQO.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP
67.52%124.53%17.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQO.L and EQQS.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQQS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQO.L.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQQO.L and 0.20% for EQQS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQO.L and EQQS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer