QQQN vs. SFYX

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) and SFYX (SoFi Next 500 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - QQQN tracks the Nasdaq Q-50 Index while SFYX tracks the Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. QQQN charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SFYX.

Performance

QQQN vs. SFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

SFYX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQN vs. SFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF	3.08%

QQQN vs. SFYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQN	SFYX
Technology	47.3%	16.0%
Healthcare	19.9%	12.0%
Consumer Cyclical	13.7%	9.9%
Industrials	8.7%	22.3%
Communication Services	5.5%	4.0%
Basic Materials	1.9%	3.4%
Utilities	1.6%	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	3.0%
Energy	-	4.8%
Financial Services	-	15.0%
Real Estate	-	7.3%

Return for Risk

QQQN vs. SFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQN	SFYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQN	SFYX	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	—	—

QQQN vs. SFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQQN vs. SFYX - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQN nor SFYX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF	0.67%	1.44%	1.25%	1.51%	1.56%	0.90%	1.16%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QQQN or SFYX?

On fees, SFYX is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQN or SFYX?

SFYX is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQN or SFYX?

SFYX has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between QQQN and SFYX?

QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index, while SFYX tracks Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQN and 0.00% for SFYX.