QQQG vs. SRVR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QQQG (Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQG is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. QQQG is actively managed, while SRVR is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQG returned 38.51% vs 3.22% for SRVR. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SRVR.

Performance

QQQG vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQG achieves a 29.97% return, which is significantly higher than SRVR's 16.03% return.

QQQG

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 29.97%
• 6M: 27.35%
• 1Y: 38.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SRVR

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -3.95%
• YTD: 16.03%
• 6M: 15.80%
• 1Y: 3.22%
• 3Y*: 8.33%
• 5Y*: -1.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQG vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	29.97%	14.72%	1.68%
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF	16.03%	-1.99%	1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQG and SRVR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2024	0.43

Return for Risk

QQQG vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 59
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

SRVR

SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 11
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 11
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQG vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQG	SRVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	0.19	+1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	0.38	+1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.05	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	0.22	+2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.82	0.46	+9.35

QQQG vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQG Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQG and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQG vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and SRVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQG	SRVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-40.99%	+17.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.79%	-14.78%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.04%	-15.04%	+10.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.58%	-15.24%	+11.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	6.96%	-3.03%

Volatility

QQQG vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) at 5.86%. This indicates that QQQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQG	SRVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.40%	5.86%	+5.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.71%	13.71%	+5.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.09%	17.27%	+4.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.32%	19.79%	+4.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.32%	21.44%	+2.88%

QQQG vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQG vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than SRVR's 2.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.05%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF	2.63%	2.67%	2.00%	3.69%	1.70%	1.19%	1.59%	1.61%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQG and SRVR in my portfolio?

QQQG and SRVR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQG or SRVR?

QQQG has higher volatility (11.40%) compared to SRVR (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQG dropped -23.61% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

Which ETF is better, QQQG or SRVR?

On 1-year performance, QQQG leads with 38.51% vs 3.22% for SRVR. On fees, QQQG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQG or SRVR?

Over the 1-year period, QQQG has performed better with a 38.51% return vs 3.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQG or SRVR?

QQQG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQG or SRVR?

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 0.05% for QQQG.

What is the main difference between QQQG and SRVR?

QQQG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SRVR is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QQQG and 0.60% for SRVR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.