QQQG vs. QEW

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QQQG (Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQG is actively managed, while QEW is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QEW.

Performance

QQQG vs. QEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QQQG

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 29.97%
• 6M: 27.35%
• 1Y: 38.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QEW

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQG vs. QEW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	33.95%
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF	17.55%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQG and QEW is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026	0.92

Return for Risk

QQQG vs. QEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 59
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

QEW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQG vs. QEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQG	QEW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.82	—	—

Drawdowns

QQQG vs. QEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, which is greater than QEW's maximum drawdown of -5.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and QEW.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQG	QEW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-5.87%	-17.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.04%	-3.20%	-1.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.58%	-1.14%	-2.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQG	QEW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.09%	20.25%	+1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.32%	20.25%	+4.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.32%	20.25%	+4.07%

QQQG vs. QEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QEW's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQG vs. QEW - Dividend Comparison

QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than QEW's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.05%	0.06%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQG and QEW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, QQQG and QEW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, QQQG or QEW?

On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQG or QEW?

QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QQQG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQG or QEW?

QEW has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.05% for QQQG.

What is the main difference between QQQG and QEW?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QQQG and 0.25% for QEW.