PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQG vs. PTLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQG vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQG vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQG
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
-5.14%14.72%2.23%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
-5.31%5.10%5.41%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQQG having a -5.14% return and PTLC slightly lower at -5.31%.


QQQG

1D
1.72%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
-5.14%
6M
-5.30%
1Y
17.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PTLC

1D
0.32%
1M
-5.90%
YTD
-5.31%
6M
-3.30%
1Y
3.31%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
10.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQG vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQG vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQG
QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PTLC
PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQG vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQGPTLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

0.29

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

0.45

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.06

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

0.38

+0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.58

1.02

+3.56

QQQG vs. PTLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQG Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the PTLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQG and PTLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQGPTLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

0.29

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.63

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between QQQG and PTLC is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQQG vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison

QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than PTLC's 1.12% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQG
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.06%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
1.12%1.06%0.67%1.18%1.26%0.73%1.08%1.10%1.00%0.97%1.08%0.42%

Drawdowns

QQQG vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum PTLC drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and PTLC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQGPTLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-26.63%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.79%

-8.77%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.82%

-7.15%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-5.70%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

3.31%

+0.77%

Volatility

QQQG vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) at 4.58%. This indicates that QQQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQGPTLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

4.58%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.82%

9.15%

+6.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.29%

11.59%

+13.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.63%

11.79%

+11.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

13.17%

+10.46%