QQQG vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

QQQG (Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQG is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. QQQG is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQG returned 33.02% vs 64.61% for BITI. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions. QQQG charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

QQQG vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQQG having a 25.34% return and BITI slightly lower at 24.48%.

QQQG

• 1D: -2.41%
• 1M: -5.50%
• 6M: 23.18%
• YTD: 25.34%
• 1Y: 33.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: 35.86%
• YTD: 24.48%
• 1Y: 64.61%
• 3Y*: -31.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQG vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	25.34%	14.72%	1.68%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	24.48%	-1.76%	-40.33%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQG and BITI is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2024	-0.42

Return for Risk

QQQG vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 52
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 58

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 52
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQG vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQG	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.47	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.04	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.25	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	2.57	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.06	6.38	+1.68

QQQG vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQG Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQG and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQG vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQG	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-92.16%	+68.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.79%	-25.28%	+11.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.43%	-86.41%	+77.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-68.40%	+64.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.11%	10.16%	-6.05%

Volatility

QQQG vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) have volatilities of 11.10% and 10.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQG	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.10%	10.76%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.73%	34.28%	-13.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.69%	44.15%	-20.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.88%	52.24%	-27.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.88%	52.24%	-27.36%

QQQG vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQG vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than BITI's 15.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.62%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.05%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQG and BITI in my portfolio?

QQQG and BITI have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQG or BITI?

QQQG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to BITI (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQG dropped -23.61% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, QQQG or BITI?

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 64.61% vs 33.02% for QQQG. On fees, QQQG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQG or BITI?

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 64.61% return vs 33.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQG or BITI?

QQQG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQG or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.62%, compared with 0.05% for QQQG.

What is the main difference between QQQG and BITI?

QQQG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QQQG and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.