QQQE vs. XNTK
QQQE (Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares) and XNTK (SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while XNTK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQE returned 15.61%/yr vs 25.25%/yr for XNTK. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
QQQE vs. XNTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQE achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly lower than XNTK's 32.86% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQE has underperformed XNTK with an annualized return of 15.61%, while XNTK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.25% annualized return.
QQQE
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 6M
- 16.29%
- 1Y
- 26.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
XNTK
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 9.85%
- YTD
- 32.86%
- 6M
- 32.78%
- 1Y
- 65.70%
- 3Y*
- 39.05%
- 5Y*
- 19.92%
- 10Y*
- 25.25%
QQQE vs. XNTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 17.14% | 14.58% | 6.98% | 33.76% | -24.47% | 17.93% | 37.85% | 36.43% | -5.40% | 26.53% |
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 32.86% | 38.06% | 23.49% | 70.13% | -41.07% | 17.63% | 73.91% | 38.08% | -7.13% | 40.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQE and XNTK is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2012 | 0.89 |
The correlation between QQQE and XNTK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQE vs. XNTK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQE
XNTK
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQE
XNTK
Consumer Cyclical
QQQE
XNTK
Industrials
QQQE
XNTK
-
Communication Services
QQQE
XNTK
Healthcare
QQQE
XNTK
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQE
XNTK
-
Utilities
QQQE
XNTK
-
Energy
QQQE
XNTK
-
Basic Materials
QQQE
XNTK
-
Financial Services
QQQE
XNTK
-
Real Estate
QQQE
XNTK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQE vs. XNTK — Risk / Return Rank
QQQE
XNTK
QQQE vs. XNTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQE | XNTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.42 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 3.73 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | 12.16 | -3.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQE vs. XNTK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQE drawdown since its inception was -32.14%, smaller than the maximum XNTK drawdown of -72.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQE and XNTK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQE | XNTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.14% | -72.38% | +40.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -17.00% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.38% | -28.11% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.14% | -48.28% | +16.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.14% | -48.28% | +16.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -4.70% | +2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -21.28% | +16.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 5.21% | -2.42% |
Volatility
QQQE vs. XNTK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) is 7.04%, while SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that QQQE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNTK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQE | XNTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | 12.53% | -5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 20.87% | -8.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 25.43% | -10.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 28.25% | -7.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 26.82% | -6.03% |
QQQE vs. XNTK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QQQE and XNTK have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
QQQE vs. XNTK - Dividend Comparison
QQQE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than XNTK's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 0.53% | 0.52% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.98% | 3.83% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.80% | 0.65% | 1.17% | 0.57% |
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.61% | 29.64% | 1.29% | 0.81% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQE and XNTK have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XNTK has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to QQQE (7.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQE dropped -32.14% vs XNTK's -72.38%.
On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.25% vs 15.61% for QQQE. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 7.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.25% return vs 15.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQE and XNTK have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
QQQE has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.17% for XNTK.
QQQE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XNTK is Technology Equities. QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and State Street.
XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQE and XNTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer