PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQE vs. EDOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQE vs. EDOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) and First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQE achieves a 19.12% return, which is significantly higher than EDOW's 5.68% return.


QQQE

1D
-0.10%
1M
10.46%
YTD
19.12%
6M
17.48%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
15.49%

EDOW

1D
-1.18%
1M
3.18%
YTD
5.68%
6M
5.68%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQE vs. EDOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
19.12%14.58%6.98%33.76%-24.47%17.93%37.85%36.43%-5.40%7.37%
EDOW
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
5.68%15.46%13.17%15.47%-7.45%18.82%6.64%24.69%-2.04%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQE and EDOW is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2017

0.75

The correlation between QQQE and EDOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQE vs. EDOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQE
EDOW

Technology

45.1%
20.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
12.7%

Industrials

10.1%
13.6%

Communication Services

9.1%
6.5%

Healthcare

8.6%
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
9.9%

Utilities

3.9%

-

Energy

2.0%
3.3%

Financial Services

1.0%
17.5%

Basic Materials

0.9%
3.3%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

QQQE
45.1%
EDOW
20.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQE
10.9%
EDOW
12.7%

Industrials

QQQE
10.1%
EDOW
13.6%

Communication Services

QQQE
9.1%
EDOW
6.5%

Healthcare

QQQE
8.6%
EDOW
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

QQQE
7.7%
EDOW
9.9%

Utilities

QQQE
3.9%
EDOW

-

Energy

QQQE
2.0%
EDOW
3.3%

Financial Services

QQQE
1.0%
EDOW
17.5%

Basic Materials

QQQE
0.9%
EDOW
3.3%

Real Estate

QQQE
0.7%
EDOW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQE vs. EDOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

EDOW
EDOW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQE vs. EDOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) and First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQEEDOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.13

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.57

7.89

+2.68

QQQE vs. EDOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQE Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the EDOW Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQE and EDOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQEEDOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.74

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.63

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.64

+0.13

Drawdowns

QQQE vs. EDOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQE drawdown since its inception was -32.14%, roughly equal to the maximum EDOW drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQE and EDOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQEEDOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.14%

-33.72%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-8.73%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.38%

-15.51%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

-21.98%

-10.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-1.18%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-4.08%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.35%

+0.37%

Volatility

QQQE vs. EDOW - Volatility Comparison

Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) at 2.74%. This indicates that QQQE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQEEDOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

2.74%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

7.92%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.15%

10.68%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.30%

14.21%

+6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

17.74%

+2.98%

QQQE vs. EDOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EDOW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQE vs. EDOW - Dividend Comparison

QQQE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than EDOW's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDOW
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
1.24%1.31%1.65%1.93%1.91%1.52%1.84%1.88%1.82%0.75%0.00%0.00%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.52%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQE and EDOW have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQE has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to EDOW (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQE dropped -32.14% vs EDOW's -33.72%.

On 5-year performance, QQQE leads with 10.30% vs 8.89% for EDOW. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EDOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQE has performed better with a 10.30% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EDOW.

EDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.52% for QQQE.

QQQE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while EDOW is Large Cap Blend Equities. QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while EDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for QQQE and 0.50% for EDOW.

QQQE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQE and EDOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer