PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQD vs. SEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQD vs. SEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQD achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly higher than SEF's 2.80% return.


QQQD

1D
0.67%
1M
9.00%
YTD
4.24%
6M
6.32%
1Y
-14.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SEF

1D
-0.25%
1M
-3.52%
YTD
2.80%
6M
4.11%
1Y
-2.58%
3Y*
-12.09%
5Y*
-6.78%
10Y*
-12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQD vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
4.24%-20.32%-27.75%
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
2.80%-9.82%-12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQD and SEF is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQD vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQD
QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

SEF
SEF Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
SEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
SEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEF Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQD vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQDSEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.98

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

-0.23

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

-0.55

-0.46

QQQD vs. SEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQD Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the SEF Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQD and SEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQD vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQD drawdown since its inception was -49.47%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQD and SEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQDSEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.47%

-96.51%

+47.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.92%

-11.14%

-11.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.64%

-96.31%

+52.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.63%

-82.74%

+52.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.98%

4.81%

+10.17%

Volatility

QQQD vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 4.04%. This indicates that QQQD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQDSEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

4.04%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.65%

11.16%

+4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.89%

14.51%

+6.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.85%

17.97%

+8.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.85%

20.48%

+6.37%

QQQD vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQD vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison

QQQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than SEF's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
3.79%4.33%5.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
3.54%4.33%5.72%4.43%0.39%0.00%0.12%1.25%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQD and SEF have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQD has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to SEF (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQD dropped -49.47% vs SEF's -96.51%.

On 1-year performance, SEF leads with -2.58% vs -14.61% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEF has performed better with a -2.58% return vs -14.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.

QQQD has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 3.54% for SEF.

QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%), while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QQQD and 0.95% for SEF.

SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQD and SEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer