PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQD vs. SEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQD vs. SEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQD achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly higher than SEF's -1.02% return.


QQQD

1D
1.07%
1M
-3.17%
6M
-0.37%
YTD
-0.87%
1Y
-15.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SEF

1D
-0.62%
1M
-4.86%
6M
-0.23%
YTD
-1.02%
1Y
-3.98%
3Y*
-12.00%
5Y*
-7.28%
10Y*
-12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQD vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
-0.87%-20.32%-27.75%
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
-1.02%-9.82%-12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQD and SEF is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQD vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQD
QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SEF
SEF Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEF Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQD vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQDSEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.97

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.28

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

-0.73

-0.48

QQQD vs. SEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQD Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the SEF Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQD and SEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQD vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQD drawdown since its inception was -49.47%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQD and SEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQDSEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.47%

-96.51%

+47.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.94%

-14.12%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.40%

-96.45%

+50.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-82.78%

+51.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.95%

5.43%

+7.52%

Volatility

QQQD vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 4.35%. This indicates that QQQD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQDSEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

4.35%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.58%

11.33%

+5.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.37%

14.65%

+6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.83%

17.98%

+8.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.83%

20.45%

+6.38%

QQQD vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQD vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison

QQQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than SEF's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
3.10%4.33%5.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
3.39%4.33%5.72%4.43%0.39%0.00%0.12%1.25%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQD and SEF have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to SEF (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQD dropped -49.47% vs SEF's -96.51%.

On 1-year performance, SEF leads with -3.98% vs -15.69% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEF has performed better with a -3.98% return vs -15.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.

SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 3.10% for QQQD.

QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%), while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QQQD and 0.95% for SEF.

SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQD and SEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer