PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQD vs. SEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQD vs. SEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQD achieves a -2.89% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's 8.89% return.


QQQD

1D
1.38%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
-2.89%
6M
-2.43%
1Y
-21.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SEF

1D
1.10%
1M
1.81%
YTD
8.89%
6M
6.43%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
-10.34%
5Y*
-5.21%
10Y*
-11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQD vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
-2.89%-20.32%-27.69%
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
8.89%-9.82%-12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQD and SEF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQD vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQD
QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SEF
SEF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEF Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQD vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQDSEFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.08

0.26

-1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.55

0.50

-2.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.06

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

0.39

-1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.23

0.73

-1.96

QQQD vs. SEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQD Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the SEF Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQD and SEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQDSEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.08

0.26

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.86

-0.49

-0.37

Drawdowns

QQQD vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQD drawdown since its inception was -49.47%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQD and SEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQDSEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.47%

-96.51%

+47.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.65%

-9.72%

-16.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.50%

-96.09%

+48.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.34%

-82.72%

+52.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.72%

5.14%

+12.58%

Volatility

QQQD vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 3.01%. This indicates that QQQD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQDSEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

3.01%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.43%

10.85%

+3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.21%

14.34%

+5.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.77%

17.96%

+8.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.77%

20.52%

+6.25%

QQQD vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQD vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison

QQQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than SEF's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
4.07%4.33%5.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
3.35%4.33%5.72%4.43%0.39%0.00%0.12%1.25%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQD and SEF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQD has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to SEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQD dropped -49.47% vs SEF's -96.51%.

On 1-year performance, SEF leads with 3.73% vs -21.80% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEF has performed better with a 3.73% return vs -21.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.

QQQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 3.35% for SEF.

QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%), while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QQQD and 0.95% for SEF.

SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQD and SEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer