QQQD vs. SEF
QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds - QQQD tracks the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%) while SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQQD returned -21.80% vs 3.73% for SEF. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQD charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SEF.
Performance
QQQD vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQD achieves a -2.89% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's 8.89% return.
QQQD
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -2.89%
- 6M
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- -21.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- -10.34%
- 5Y*
- -5.21%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
QQQD vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | -2.89% | -20.32% | -27.69% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 8.89% | -9.82% | -12.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQD and SEF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQD vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
QQQD
SEF
QQQD vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | 0.26 | -1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | 0.50 | -2.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.06 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 0.39 | -1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 0.73 | -1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.08 | 0.26 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | -0.49 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
QQQD vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQD drawdown since its inception was -49.47%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQD and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.47% | -96.51% | +47.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.65% | -9.72% | -16.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.50% | -96.09% | +48.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.34% | -82.72% | +52.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.72% | 5.14% | +12.58% |
Volatility
QQQD vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 3.01%. This indicates that QQQD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 3.01% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.43% | 10.85% | +3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.21% | 14.34% | +5.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 17.96% | +8.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 20.52% | +6.25% |
QQQD vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQD vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
QQQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than SEF's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 4.07% | 4.33% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.35% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQD and SEF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQD has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to SEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQD dropped -49.47% vs SEF's -96.51%.
On 1-year performance, SEF leads with 3.73% vs -21.80% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SEF has performed better with a 3.73% return vs -21.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.
QQQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 3.35% for SEF.
QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%), while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QQQD and 0.95% for SEF.
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQD and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer