QQQD vs. CARD
QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds - QQQD tracks the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%) while CARD tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQQD returned -22.69% vs -37.29% for CARD. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQD charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.
Performance
QQQD vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQD achieves a -4.06% return, which is significantly lower than CARD's -3.37% return.
QQQD
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- -4.06%
- 6M
- -3.12%
- 1Y
- -22.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARD
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -13.02%
- YTD
- -3.37%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- -37.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQD vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | -4.06% | -20.32% | -27.69% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -3.37% | -60.21% | -57.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQD and CARD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between QQQD and CARD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQD vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
QQQD
CARD
QQQD vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.95 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.75 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | -1.10 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.12 | -0.55 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.87 | -0.66 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
QQQD vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQD drawdown since its inception was -49.47%, smaller than the maximum CARD drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQD and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.47% | -93.51% | +44.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.65% | -49.57% | +22.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.13% | -92.74% | +44.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.37% | -68.17% | +37.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.79% | 34.04% | -16.25% |
Volatility
QQQD vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) is 4.88%, while Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a volatility of 22.78%. This indicates that QQQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 22.78% | -17.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.46% | 49.82% | -35.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.24% | 68.57% | -48.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.76% | 80.47% | -53.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.76% | 80.47% | -53.71% |
QQQD vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQD vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
QQQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 4.12% | 4.33% | 5.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQD and CARD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARD has higher volatility (22.78%) compared to QQQD (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQD dropped -49.47% vs CARD's -93.51%.
On 1-year performance, QQQD leads with -22.69% vs -37.29% for CARD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQD has performed better with a -22.69% return vs -37.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CARD.
QQQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%), while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QQQD and 0.95% for CARD.
CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQD and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer