QQQA vs. SSO
QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQA returned 14.74%/yr vs 19.62%/yr for SSO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
QQQA vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 65.37% return, which is significantly higher than SSO's 19.37% return.
QQQA
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- 23.31%
- YTD
- 65.37%
- 6M
- 67.98%
- 1Y
- 88.43%
- 3Y*
- 34.58%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- —
SSO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 9.75%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 18.81%
- 1Y
- 52.69%
- 3Y*
- 37.56%
- 5Y*
- 19.62%
- 10Y*
- 24.21%
QQQA vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 65.37% | 9.87% | 16.17% | 24.98% | -29.08% | 8.43% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 19.37% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 31.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQA and SSO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between QQQA and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQA vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQA
SSO
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QQQA
SSO
Communication Services
QQQA
SSO
Energy
QQQA
SSO
Healthcare
QQQA
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
QQQA
SSO
Basic Materials
QQQA
-
SSO
Consumer Defensive
QQQA
-
SSO
Financial Services
QQQA
-
SSO
Industrials
QQQA
-
SSO
Real Estate
QQQA
-
SSO
Utilities
QQQA
-
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQA vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQA
SSO
QQQA vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQA | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.38 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.11 | 2.91 | +3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.85 | 12.80 | +10.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQA | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.41 | 2.25 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.59 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.42 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
QQQA vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQA | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -84.67% | +46.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -18.17% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.84% | -35.21% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.44% | -46.73% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.40% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -19.57% | +3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 4.13% | -0.25% |
Volatility
QQQA vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 5.66%. This indicates that QQQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQA | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 5.66% | +4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 17.78% | +4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.05% | 23.60% | +2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 33.65% | -7.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 35.89% | -10.12% |
QQQA vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQA vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than SSO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.06% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQA and SSO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to SSO (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQA dropped -38.44% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 5-year performance, SSO leads with 19.62% vs 14.74% for QQQA. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SSO has performed better with a 19.62% return vs 14.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
SSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.
QQQA is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQQA and 0.87% for SSO.
QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQA and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer