PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQA vs. RPGRY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQA vs. RPGRY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and REA Group Limited (RPGRY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 62.20% return, which is significantly higher than RPGRY's -25.27% return.


QQQA

1D
-1.25%
1M
9.62%
YTD
62.20%
6M
58.27%
1Y
82.44%
3Y*
32.99%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*

RPGRY

1D
-0.88%
1M
-17.20%
YTD
-25.27%
6M
-29.18%
1Y
-42.18%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
16.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQA vs. RPGRY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
62.20%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%9.84%
RPGRY
REA Group Limited
-25.27%-9.47%11.53%171.12%2.55%1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQA and RPGRY is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQA vs. RPGRY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

RPGRY
RPGRY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
RPGRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPGRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPGRY Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RPGRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPGRY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQA vs. RPGRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and REA Group Limited (RPGRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQARPGRYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

0.93

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

-0.72

+6.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.29

-1.11

+21.40

QQQA vs. RPGRY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQA Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the RPGRY Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQA and RPGRY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQA vs. RPGRY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum RPGRY drawdown of -58.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and RPGRY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQARPGRYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-58.38%

+19.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-58.38%

+43.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.84%

-58.38%

+27.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.44%

-58.38%

+19.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.30%

-58.38%

+51.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.54%

-21.80%

+6.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

38.15%

-34.07%

Volatility

QQQA vs. RPGRY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a higher volatility of 17.19% compared to REA Group Limited (RPGRY) at 11.36%. This indicates that QQQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPGRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQARPGRYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.19%

11.36%

+5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.69%

39.60%

-12.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.24%

71.56%

-41.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.72%

99.48%

-72.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.54%

96.14%

-69.60%

Dividends

QQQA vs. RPGRY - Dividend Comparison

QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than RPGRY's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.06%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%0.00%
RPGRY
REA Group Limited
1.96%1.30%0.91%0.86%2.51%2.02%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQA and RPGRY have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (17.19%) compared to RPGRY (11.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQA dropped -38.44% vs RPGRY's -58.38%.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQA and RPGRY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer