QQQA vs. NAPR
QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) and NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQQA tracks the NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross while NAPR tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQA returned 14.74%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for NAPR. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for NAPR.
Performance
QQQA vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 65.37% return, which is significantly higher than NAPR's 10.51% return.
QQQA
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- 23.31%
- YTD
- 65.37%
- 6M
- 67.98%
- 1Y
- 88.43%
- 3Y*
- 34.58%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- —
NAPR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 18.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQA vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 65.37% | 9.87% | 16.17% | 24.98% | -29.08% | 8.43% |
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 10.51% | 6.56% | 13.29% | 30.60% | -12.13% | 7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQA and NAPR is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.80 |
The correlation between QQQA and NAPR shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQA vs. NAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQA
NAPR
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QQQA
NAPR
Communication Services
QQQA
NAPR
Energy
QQQA
NAPR
Healthcare
QQQA
NAPR
Consumer Cyclical
QQQA
NAPR
Basic Materials
QQQA
-
NAPR
Consumer Defensive
QQQA
-
NAPR
Financial Services
QQQA
-
NAPR
Industrials
QQQA
-
NAPR
Real Estate
QQQA
-
NAPR
Utilities
QQQA
-
NAPR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQA vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank
QQQA
NAPR
QQQA vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQA | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 2.18 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.11 | 14.95 | -8.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.85 | 84.84 | -62.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQA | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.41 | 4.78 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.90 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 1.07 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
QQQA vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, which is greater than NAPR's maximum drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and NAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQA | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -16.53% | -21.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -1.24% | -13.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.84% | -14.52% | -16.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.44% | -16.53% | -21.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.12% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -2.28% | -13.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 0.22% | +3.66% |
Volatility
QQQA vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) at 1.10%. This indicates that QQQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQA | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 1.10% | +9.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 2.82% | +19.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.05% | 3.89% | +22.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 11.27% | +14.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 10.61% | +15.16% |
QQQA vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than NAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQA vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison
QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while NAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.06% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQA and NAPR have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to NAPR (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQA dropped -38.44% vs NAPR's -16.53%.
On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 14.74% vs 10.10% for NAPR. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, NAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 10.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NAPR.
QQQA has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for NAPR.
QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQQA and 0.79% for NAPR.
NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs 3.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQA and NAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer