PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ5.L vs. QTOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ5.L vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ5.L achieves a 22.16% return, which is significantly higher than QTOP's 14.48% return.


QQQ5.L

1D
-11.37%
1M
-28.71%
6M
20.21%
YTD
22.16%
1Y
54.79%
3Y*
33.96%
5Y*
10Y*

QTOP

1D
-1.43%
1M
-3.31%
6M
13.20%
YTD
14.48%
1Y
27.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ5.L vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQ5.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities
22.16%2.21%16.77%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
14.48%22.19%6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ5.L and QTOP is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024

0.66

The correlation between QQQ5.L and QTOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQ5.L vs. QTOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQ5.L
QTOP

Technology

58.0%
62.3%

Communication Services

14.5%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
6.9%

Healthcare

3.7%
2.9%

Industrials

2.6%
0.9%

Utilities

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.4%

Energy

0.5%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QQQ5.L
58.0%
QTOP
62.3%

Communication Services

QQQ5.L
14.5%
QTOP
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ5.L
11.6%
QTOP
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

QQQ5.L
6.6%
QTOP
6.9%

Healthcare

QQQ5.L
3.7%
QTOP
2.9%

Industrials

QQQ5.L
2.6%
QTOP
0.9%

Utilities

QQQ5.L
1.2%
QTOP

-

Basic Materials

QQQ5.L
1.0%
QTOP
1.4%

Energy

QQQ5.L
0.5%
QTOP

-

Financial Services

QQQ5.L
0.2%
QTOP

-

Real Estate

QQQ5.L
0.1%
QTOP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ5.L vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ5.L
QQQ5.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
QQQ5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ5.L vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQ5.LQTOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.24

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.11

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

7.15

-4.71

QQQ5.L vs. QTOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the QTOP Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ5.L and QTOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ5.L vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ5.L drawdown since its inception was -96.50%, which is greater than QTOP's maximum drawdown of -23.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ5.L and QTOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQ5.LQTOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.50%

-23.28%

-73.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.02%

-12.88%

-44.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.49%

-6.91%

-49.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.59%

-3.82%

-70.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.36%

3.80%

+18.56%

Volatility

QQQ5.L vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L) has a higher volatility of 31.01% compared to iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) at 8.51%. This indicates that QQQ5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQ5.LQTOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.01%

8.51%

+22.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.80%

17.18%

+52.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.91%

20.48%

+67.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.54%

23.57%

+81.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.54%

23.57%

+81.97%

QQQ5.L vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ5.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QTOP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQ5.L vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison

QQQ5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


PositionTTM20252024
QQQ5.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
0.34%0.38%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ5.L and QTOP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QTOP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QTOP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ5.L.

QQQ5.L tracks Invesco QQQ Trust, while QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QQQ5.L and 0.20% for QTOP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ5.L and QTOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer