PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ3.L vs. QYLD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ3.L vs. QYLD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QYLD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ3.L achieves a 23.91% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD.L's 4.70% return.


QQQ3.L

1D
-6.88%
1M
-16.73%
6M
22.68%
YTD
23.91%
1Y
51.82%
3Y*
43.17%
5Y*
16.26%
10Y*
41.43%

QYLD.L

1D
-2.15%
1M
-2.53%
6M
3.85%
YTD
4.70%
1Y
16.20%
3Y*
11.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ3.L vs. QYLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
23.91%27.63%59.91%209.50%-19.91%
QYLD.L
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.70%5.36%24.77%23.25%-2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ3.L and QYLD.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022

0.63

The correlation between QQQ3.L and QYLD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ3.L vs. QYLD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ3.L
QQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD.L
QYLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
QYLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ3.L vs. QYLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QYLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQ3.LQYLD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

3.44

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

15.06

-10.88

QQQ3.L vs. QYLD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the QYLD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ3.L and QYLD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ3.L vs. QYLD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ3.L drawdown since its inception was -81.35%, which is greater than QYLD.L's maximum drawdown of -21.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ3.L and QYLD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQ3.LQYLD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.35%

-21.59%

-59.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.92%

-4.68%

-31.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.20%

-21.59%

-36.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.57%

-3.81%

-18.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-2.76%

-16.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.36%

1.07%

+11.29%

Volatility

QQQ3.L vs. QYLD.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) has a higher volatility of 19.28% compared to Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QYLD.L) at 5.08%. This indicates that QQQ3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQ3.LQYLD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.28%

5.08%

+14.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.47%

8.46%

+33.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.00%

9.99%

+42.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.05%

16.29%

+46.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.25%

16.29%

+43.96%

QQQ3.L vs. QYLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQ3.L vs. QYLD.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQ3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD.L
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
11.85%11.41%12.28%10.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ3.L and QYLD.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QYLD.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QYLD.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ3.L.

QQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while QYLD.L tracks Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite v2 UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QQQ3.L and 0.45% for QYLD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ3.L and QYLD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer