PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ3.L vs. EQQD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ3.L vs. EQQD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ3.L achieves a 36.00% return, which is significantly higher than EQQD.L's 16.04% return.


QQQ3.L

1D
-2.11%
1M
-12.36%
6M
37.20%
YTD
36.00%
1Y
67.92%
3Y*
47.44%
5Y*
18.45%
10Y*
42.93%

EQQD.L

1D
-0.82%
1M
-3.53%
6M
16.06%
YTD
16.04%
1Y
28.56%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
15.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ3.L vs. EQQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
36.00%27.63%59.91%209.50%-79.58%54.07%
EQQD.L
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist
16.04%19.91%26.74%56.64%-33.32%16.32%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ3.L and EQQD.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2021

0.99

The correlation between QQQ3.L and EQQD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ3.L vs. EQQD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ3.L
QQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQD.L
EQQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EQQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ3.L vs. EQQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQ3.LEQQD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.54

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

8.69

-3.15

QQQ3.L vs. EQQD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the EQQD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ3.L and EQQD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ3.L vs. EQQD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ3.L drawdown since its inception was -81.35%, which is greater than EQQD.L's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ3.L and EQQD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQ3.LEQQD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.35%

-34.95%

-46.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.92%

-11.18%

-24.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.20%

-22.84%

-35.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.35%

-34.95%

-46.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.02%

-3.82%

-11.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-8.95%

-10.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.23%

3.28%

+8.95%

Volatility

QQQ3.L vs. EQQD.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) has a higher volatility of 18.22% compared to Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) at 6.19%. This indicates that QQQ3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQ3.LEQQD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.22%

6.19%

+12.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.95%

13.91%

+27.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.61%

17.40%

+34.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.99%

20.98%

+42.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.22%

20.86%

+39.36%

QQQ3.L vs. EQQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQD.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQ3.L vs. EQQD.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQ3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EQQD.L
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist
0.59%0.64%0.75%0.75%0.95%0.31%
QQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, QQQ3.L and EQQD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EQQD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ3.L.

QQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while EQQD.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QQQ3.L and 0.20% for EQQD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ3.L and EQQD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer