QQQ3.L vs. CSH.PA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QQQ3.L (WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged) and CSH.PA (Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ3.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while CSH.PA is a Money Market fund tracking the Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ3.L returned 45.35%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for CSH.PA. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQ3.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSH.PA.

Performance

QQQ3.L vs. CSH.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

QQQ3.L is traded in USD, while CSH.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSH.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ3.L achieves a 42.93% return, which is significantly higher than CSH.PA's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ3.L has outperformed CSH.PA with an annualized return of 45.35%, while CSH.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.14% annualized return.

QQQ3.L

• 1D: 9.01%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 42.93%
• 6M: 45.27%
• 1Y: 100.95%
• 3Y*: 56.88%
• 5Y*: 23.47%
• 10Y*: 45.35%

CSH.PA

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: -0.38%
• 6M: -0.17%
• 1Y: 2.15%
• 3Y*: 5.76%
• 5Y*: 0.94%
• 10Y*: 1.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ3.L vs. CSH.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QQQ3.L WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged	42.93%	27.63%	59.91%	209.50%	-79.58%	87.37%	131.34%	128.92%	-21.29%	114.27%
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc	-0.38%	15.99%	-2.72%	6.48%	-6.06%	-7.41%	10.96%	-2.54%	-5.19%	13.62%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ3.L and CSH.PA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2012	0.06

The correlation between QQQ3.L and CSH.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QQQ3.L vs. CSH.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ3.L

QQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 64
QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
QQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

CSH.PA

CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 97
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ3.L vs. CSH.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQ3.L	CSH.PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	0.59	+1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	0.91	+1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.11	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	0.74	+2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.60	1.89	+6.71

QQQ3.L vs. CSH.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ3.L and CSH.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQ3.L vs. CSH.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ3.L drawdown since its inception was -81.35%, which is greater than CSH.PA's maximum drawdown of -38.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ3.L and CSH.PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQ3.L	CSH.PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.35%	-38.42%	-42.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.92%	-4.96%	-30.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.20%	-7.54%	-50.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.35%	-21.46%	-59.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.35%	-23.47%	-57.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.68%	-17.54%	+6.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.08%	-21.11%	+2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.69%	1.96%	+9.73%

Volatility

QQQ3.L vs. CSH.PA - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) has a higher volatility of 18.23% compared to Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) at 1.17%. This indicates that QQQ3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQ3.L	CSH.PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.23%	1.17%	+17.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.27%	4.37%	+32.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.68%	6.27%	+42.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.47%	7.58%	+54.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.17%	7.29%	+52.88%

QQQ3.L vs. CSH.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH.PA's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQ3.L vs. CSH.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQ3.L nor CSH.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	0.05%	2.60%
QQQ3.L WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQ3.L and CSH.PA in my portfolio?

QQQ3.L and CSH.PA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQQ3.L or CSH.PA?

On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQ3.L or CSH.PA?

CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ3.L.

What is the main difference between QQQ3.L and CSH.PA?

QQQ3.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CSH.PA is Money Market. QQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QQQ3.L and 0.10% for CSH.PA.