QQJG vs. SFYX
QQJG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) and SFYX (SoFi Next 500 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - QQJG tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 ESG Index - Benchmark TR Gross while SFYX tracks the Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQJG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SFYX.
Performance
QQJG vs. SFYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QQJG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 18.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFYX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQJG vs. SFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 1.44% | 18.05% | 14.67% | 17.20% | -27.69% | 0.91% |
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 5.66% | 14.25% | 14.45% | 17.70% | -22.88% | -1.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQJG and SFYX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between QQJG and SFYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQJG vs. SFYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQJG
SFYX
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QQJG
SFYX
Healthcare
QQJG
SFYX
Consumer Cyclical
QQJG
SFYX
Industrials
QQJG
SFYX
Communication Services
QQJG
SFYX
Consumer Defensive
QQJG
SFYX
Basic Materials
QQJG
SFYX
Energy
QQJG
SFYX
Financial Services
QQJG
SFYX
Real Estate
QQJG
-
SFYX
Utilities
QQJG
-
SFYX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQJG vs. SFYX — Risk / Return Rank
QQJG
SFYX
QQJG vs. SFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) and SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQJG | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQJG | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | — | — |
Drawdowns
QQJG vs. SFYX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQJG | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | — | — |
Volatility
QQJG vs. SFYX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQJG | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.00% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.70% | — | — |
QQJG vs. SFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQJG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQJG vs. SFYX - Dividend Comparison
QQJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.86%, more than SFYX's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 13.86% | 0.68% | 0.65% | 0.54% | 0.70% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 1.36% | 1.44% | 1.25% | 1.51% | 1.56% | 0.90% | 1.16% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQJG and SFYX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFYX is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFYX is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQJG.
QQJG has the higher dividend yield at 13.86%, compared with 1.36% for SFYX.
QQJG tracks Nasdaq Next Generation 100 ESG Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SFYX tracks Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQJG and 0.00% for SFYX.
Find the right allocation for QQJG and SFYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer