QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO
QQI.TO (BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF) and QQQY.TO (Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQI.TO tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%) while QQQY.TO tracks the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.87, they often move in opposite directions. QQI.TO charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for QQQY.TO.
Performance
QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQI.TO achieves a -16.04% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY.TO's 18.33% return.
QQI.TO
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- -16.04%
- 6M
- -16.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY.TO
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 18.33%
- 6M
- 17.30%
- 1Y
- 39.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQI.TO BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF | -16.04% | -3.15% |
QQQY.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund | 18.33% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQI.TO and QQQY.TO is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2025 | -0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQI.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQY.TO
QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF (QQI.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQI.TO | QQQY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQI.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQY.TO drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQI.TO and QQQY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQI.TO | QQQY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.23% | -26.27% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.72% | -2.09% | -22.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -4.03% | -4.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.99% | — |
Volatility
QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQI.TO | QQQY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.26% | 20.61% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 24.19% | -3.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 24.19% | -3.93% |
QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQI.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY.TO's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQI.TO BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQY.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund | 12.66% | 13.97% | 15.92% | 2.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQI.TO and QQQY.TO have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQY.TO is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQY.TO is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for QQI.TO.
QQI.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while QQQY.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for QQI.TO and 0.74% for QQQY.TO.
Find the right allocation for QQI.TO and QQQY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer