PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF (QQI.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQI.TO achieves a -16.04% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY.TO's 18.33% return.


QQI.TO

1D
-2.02%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
-16.04%
6M
-16.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY.TO

1D
2.29%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
18.33%
6M
17.30%
1Y
39.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQI.TO and QQQY.TO is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2025

-0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQI.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QQQY.TO
QQQY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF (QQI.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQI.TOQQQY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.81

QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQI.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQY.TO drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQI.TO and QQQY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQI.TOQQQY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.23%

-26.27%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.72%

-2.09%

-22.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-4.03%

-4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

Volatility

QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQI.TOQQQY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.26%

20.61%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.26%

24.19%

-3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

24.19%

-3.93%

QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQI.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY.TO's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQI.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.66%.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQI.TO
BetaPro Nasdaq-100 Daily Inverse ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQY.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund
12.66%13.97%15.92%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQI.TO and QQQY.TO have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQY.TO is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQY.TO is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for QQI.TO.

QQI.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while QQQY.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for QQI.TO and 0.74% for QQQY.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQI.TO and QQQY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer