PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQHG vs. SOXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQHG vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 90.13% return.


QQHG

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
8.81%
6M
7.73%
1Y
22.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOXQ

1D
-0.25%
1M
10.27%
YTD
90.13%
6M
87.11%
1Y
148.28%
3Y*
57.47%
5Y*
34.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQHG vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
8.81%20.59%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
90.13%64.95%

Correlation

The correlation between QQHG and SOXQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2025

0.79

The correlation between QQHG and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQHG vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQHG vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQHGSOXQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.55

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

9.57

-5.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

34.13

-20.49

QQHG vs. SOXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQHG Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is lower than the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQHG and SOXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQHG vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and SOXQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQHGSOXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-46.01%

+39.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-15.59%

+9.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-8.05%

+5.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.02%

-12.87%

+11.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

4.36%

-2.72%

Volatility

QQHG vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) is 4.47%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 22.00%. This indicates that QQHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQHGSOXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

22.00%

-17.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

32.41%

-24.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

38.78%

-28.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.10%

37.33%

-27.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.10%

37.22%

-27.12%

QQHG vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQHG vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than SOXQ's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
0.26%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.27%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQHG and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXQ has higher volatility (22.00%) compared to QQHG (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQHG dropped -6.18% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.

On 1-year performance, SOXQ leads with 148.28% vs 22.34% for QQHG. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QQHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 148.28% return vs 22.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQHG.

SOXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.26% for QQHG.

QQHG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQHG and 0.19% for SOXQ.

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQHG and SOXQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer