PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQHG vs. KSPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQHG vs. KSPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Kraneshares Hedgeye Hedged Equity Index ETF (KSPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly higher than KSPY's 5.43% return.


QQHG

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.73%
YTD
11.43%
6M
10.75%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KSPY

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.96%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.87%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQHG vs. KSPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQHG and KSPY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.74

The correlation between QQHG and KSPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQHG vs. KSPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

KSPY
KSPY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
KSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
KSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQHG vs. KSPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Kraneshares Hedgeye Hedged Equity Index ETF (KSPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQHGKSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.59

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

4.07

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.07

21.74

-4.67

QQHG vs. KSPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQHG Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the KSPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQHG and KSPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQHGKSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

2.60

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.35

1.17

+2.19

Drawdowns

QQHG vs. KSPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum KSPY drawdown of -11.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and KSPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQHGKSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-11.67%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-4.46%

-1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.28%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-1.18%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

0.83%

+0.72%

Volatility

QQHG vs. KSPY - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to Kraneshares Hedgeye Hedged Equity Index ETF (KSPY) at 0.76%. This indicates that QQHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KSPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQHGKSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

0.76%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

5.51%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.47%

7.00%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.53%

10.53%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.53%

10.53%

-1.00%

QQHG vs. KSPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than KSPY's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQHG vs. KSPY - Dividend Comparison

QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than KSPY's 5.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
KSPY
Kraneshares Hedgeye Hedged Equity Index ETF
5.85%6.16%1.31%
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
0.20%0.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQHG and KSPY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQHG has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to KSPY (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQHG dropped -6.18% vs KSPY's -11.67%.

On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 26.43% vs 18.09% for KSPY. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, KSPY has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 26.43% return vs 18.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for KSPY.

KSPY has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQHG and 0.78% for KSPY.

QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQHG and KSPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer