PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQHG vs. HEQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQHG vs. HEQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly higher than HEQQ's 4.36% return.


QQHG

1D
-0.57%
1M
3.42%
YTD
10.80%
6M
10.03%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HEQQ

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.32%
YTD
4.36%
6M
4.07%
1Y
16.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQHG vs. HEQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQHG and HEQQ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.90

The correlation between QQHG and HEQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQHG vs. HEQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

HEQQ
HEQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HEQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQHG vs. HEQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQHGHEQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.39

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

2.18

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.10

8.59

+8.51

QQHG vs. HEQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQHG Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the HEQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQHG and HEQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQHGHEQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

2.04

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.26

1.71

+1.55

Drawdowns

QQHG vs. HEQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum HEQQ drawdown of -7.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and HEQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQHGHEQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-7.64%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-7.64%

+1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.84%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-1.11%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.93%

-0.38%

Volatility

QQHG vs. HEQQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ) at 1.33%. This indicates that QQHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQHGHEQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

1.33%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.69%

6.63%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.43%

8.14%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.54%

10.87%

-1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.54%

10.87%

-1.33%

QQHG vs. HEQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HEQQ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQHG vs. HEQQ - Dividend Comparison

QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, more than HEQQ's 0.19% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, QQHG and HEQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQHG has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to HEQQ (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQHG dropped -6.18% vs HEQQ's -7.64%.

On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 26.49% vs 16.57% for HEQQ. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, HEQQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 26.49% return vs 16.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HEQQ.

QQHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.19% for HEQQ.

QQHG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while HEQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQHG and 0.50% for HEQQ.

QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQHG and HEQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer