QQHG vs. CTA
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA).
QQHG and CTA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQHG is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on May 5, 2025. CTA is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Mar 7, 2022.
Performance
QQHG vs. CTA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQHG vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | -1.76% | 20.59% |
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 9.60% | 1.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's 9.60% return.
QQHG
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTA
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 3.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQHG vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QQHG vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank
QQHG
CTA
QQHG vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQHG | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.17 | 0.64 | +1.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQHG and CTA is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QQHG vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison
QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than CTA's 3.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | 0.23% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 3.90% | 3.19% | 4.80% | 7.78% | 6.58% |
Drawdowns
QQHG vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum CTA drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and CTA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQHG | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -18.07% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | -3.92% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -5.74% | +4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.16% | — |
Volatility
QQHG vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQHG | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.60% | 16.24% | -6.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.60% | 15.63% | -6.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.60% | 15.63% | -6.03% |