PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQEW vs. AIRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQEW vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQEW achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 32.79% return. Over the past 10 years, QQEW has underperformed AIRR with an annualized return of 14.72%, while AIRR has yielded a comparatively higher 22.14% annualized return.


QQEW

1D
0.22%
1M
1.83%
YTD
7.88%
6M
6.21%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
14.72%

AIRR

1D
0.74%
1M
4.33%
YTD
32.79%
6M
28.48%
1Y
62.89%
3Y*
37.01%
5Y*
26.09%
10Y*
22.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQEW vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQEW
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund
7.88%14.22%7.00%33.31%-24.59%17.75%37.30%35.87%-5.30%26.04%
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
32.79%27.92%33.45%31.43%-2.08%33.01%17.17%33.97%-20.57%16.28%

Correlation

The correlation between QQEW and AIRR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2014

0.65

The correlation between QQEW and AIRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQEW vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQEW
AIRR

Technology

61.7%
0.7%

Healthcare

13.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%

-

Communication Services

9.7%

-

Industrials

3.0%
92.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

3.8%

Financial Services

-

6.9%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QQEW
61.7%
AIRR
0.7%

Healthcare

QQEW
13.2%
AIRR

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQEW
10.3%
AIRR

-

Communication Services

QQEW
9.7%
AIRR

-

Industrials

QQEW
3.0%
AIRR
92.4%

Consumer Defensive

QQEW
2.0%
AIRR

-

Real Estate

QQEW
1.6%
AIRR

-

Basic Materials

QQEW

-

AIRR

-

Energy

QQEW

-

AIRR
3.8%

Financial Services

QQEW

-

AIRR
6.9%

Utilities

QQEW

-

AIRR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQEW vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQEW
QQEW Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
QQEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQEW Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
QQEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQEW Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQEW vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQEWAIRRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.38

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

4.83

-3.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

17.62

-14.98

QQEW vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQEW Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQEW and AIRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQEW vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQEW drawdown since its inception was -58.16%, which is greater than AIRR's maximum drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQEW and AIRR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQEWAIRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-42.37%

-15.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.74%

-13.09%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.43%

-27.95%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.12%

-27.95%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.12%

-42.37%

+10.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.28%

-2.08%

-3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-7.46%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.26%

3.58%

+1.68%

Volatility

QQEW vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) have volatilities of 8.81% and 8.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQEWAIRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.81%

8.81%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.28%

20.61%

-5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.97%

26.36%

-8.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.96%

25.43%

-4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.92%

26.33%

-5.41%

QQEW vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQEW has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQEW vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

QQEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.13%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
QQEW
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund
0.29%0.41%0.57%0.70%0.66%0.24%0.34%0.48%0.56%0.48%0.73%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQEW and AIRR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIRR has higher volatility (8.81%) compared to QQEW (8.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQEW dropped -58.16% vs AIRR's -42.37%.

On 10-year performance, AIRR leads with 22.14% vs 14.72% for QQEW. On fees, QQEW is cheaper at 0.58% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 22.14% return vs 14.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQEW is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.

QQEW has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.

QQEW is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while AIRR is Building & Construction. QQEW tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQEW and 0.69% for AIRR.

AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQEW and AIRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer