QQEW vs. AIRR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQEW (First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQEW is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQEW returned 14.57%/yr vs 21.89%/yr for AIRR. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQEW charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for AIRR.

Performance

QQEW vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQEW achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.77% return. Over the past 10 years, QQEW has underperformed AIRR with an annualized return of 14.57%, while AIRR has yielded a comparatively higher 21.89% annualized return.

QQEW

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 14.51%
• YTD: 12.15%
• 6M: 10.58%
• 1Y: 20.94%
• 3Y*: 16.13%
• 5Y*: 8.78%
• 10Y*: 14.57%

AIRR

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 31.77%
• 6M: 31.32%
• 1Y: 65.82%
• 3Y*: 37.10%
• 5Y*: 25.40%
• 10Y*: 21.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQEW vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QQEW First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund	12.15%	14.22%	7.00%	33.31%	-24.59%	17.75%	37.30%	35.87%	-5.30%	26.04%
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF	31.77%	27.92%	33.45%	31.43%	-2.08%	33.01%	17.17%	33.97%	-20.57%	16.28%

Correlation

The correlation between QQEW and AIRR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014	0.65

The correlation between QQEW and AIRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQEW vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQEW	AIRR
Technology	55.9%	0.5%
Healthcare	14.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	-
Communication Services	10.3%	-
Industrials	3.3%	84.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	-
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	3.8%
Financial Services	-	9.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

QQEW vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQEW

QQEW Risk / Return Rank: 31
QQEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
QQEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
QQEW Omega Ratio Rank: 32
QQEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
QQEW Martin Ratio Rank: 28

AIRR

AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 78
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQEW vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQEW	AIRR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	2.61	-1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	3.37	-1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.41	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	5.05	-3.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.09	18.68	-14.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQEW vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQEW and AIRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQEW	AIRR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	2.61	-1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	1.01	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.84	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.67	-0.13

Drawdowns

QQEW vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQEW drawdown since its inception was -58.16%, which is greater than AIRR's maximum drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQEW and AIRR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQEW	AIRR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.16%	-42.37%	-15.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.74%	-13.09%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.43%	-27.95%	+6.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.12%	-27.95%	-4.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.12%	-42.37%	+10.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.53%	-1.86%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.30%	-7.43%	-0.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.13%	3.53%	+1.60%

Volatility

QQEW vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) is 5.54%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that QQEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQEW	AIRR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	7.87%	-2.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.85%	19.82%	-5.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.81%	25.40%	-8.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.76%	25.29%	-4.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.87%	26.29%	-5.42%

QQEW vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQEW has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQEW vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

QQEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF	0.13%	0.19%	0.18%	0.23%	0.12%	0.05%	0.10%	0.20%	0.43%	0.30%	0.08%	0.47%
QQEW First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund	0.28%	0.41%	0.57%	0.70%	0.66%	0.24%	0.34%	0.48%	0.56%	0.48%	0.73%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQEW and AIRR in my portfolio?

QQEW and AIRR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQEW or AIRR?

AIRR has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to QQEW (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQEW dropped -58.16% vs AIRR's -42.37%.

Which ETF is better, QQEW or AIRR?

On 10-year performance, AIRR leads with 21.89% vs 14.57% for QQEW. On fees, QQEW is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QQEW has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQEW or AIRR?

Over the 10-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 21.89% return vs 14.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQEW or AIRR?

QQEW is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AIRR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQEW or AIRR?

QQEW has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.

What is the main difference between QQEW and AIRR?

QQEW is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while AIRR is Building & Construction. QQEW tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQEW and 0.70% for AIRR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.