QQCI.TO vs. HUTE.TO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) and HUTE.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQCI.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by CI, while HUTE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQCI.TO returned 24.09% vs 15.50% for HUTE.TO. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QQCI.TO charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HUTE.TO.

Performance

QQCI.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQCI.TO having a 11.99% return and HUTE.TO slightly lower at 11.64%.

QQCI.TO

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -4.23%
• 6M: 12.17%
• YTD: 11.99%
• 1Y: 24.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.32%

HUTE.TO

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 0.55%
• 6M: 6.54%
• YTD: 11.64%
• 1Y: 15.50%
• 3Y*: 16.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	CA$250.72K	CA$250.41K	CA$284.45K
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	CA$141.03K	CA$115.67K	CA$152.23K

QQCI.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	11.99%	12.64%	11.81%
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	11.64%	19.04%	3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between QQCI.TO and HUTE.TO is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024	-0.05

QQCI.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQCI.TO	HUTE.TO
Technology	60.9%	-
Communication Services	13.1%	40.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	-
Healthcare	3.6%	-
Industrials	2.7%	3.4%
Utilities	1.1%	40.5%
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Energy	0.5%	15.8%
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QQCI.TO vs. HUTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQCI.TO

QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

HUTE.TO

HUTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
HUTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
HUTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
HUTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
HUTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQCI.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQCI.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.25	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	1.81	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.22	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	2.29	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.57	6.21	+2.36

QQCI.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCI.TO and HUTE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQCI.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCI.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, roughly equal to the maximum HUTE.TO drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCI.TO and HUTE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQCI.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.95%	-18.35%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.48%	-6.85%	-1.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.84%	-5.11%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.07%	-3.91%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	2.52%	+0.04%

Volatility

QQCI.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) have volatilities of 4.91% and 4.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQCI.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	4.87%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.52%	11.01%	+0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.92%	12.58%	+2.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.92%	14.64%	+1.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.92%	14.64%	+1.28%

QQCI.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCI.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than HUTE.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQCI.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, less than HUTE.TO's 9.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	9.55%	9.64%	10.24%	10.72%	1.61%
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	9.32%	9.34%	3.17%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQCI.TO and HUTE.TO in my portfolio?

QQCI.TO and HUTE.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQCI.TO or HUTE.TO?

On fees, QQCI.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQCI.TO or HUTE.TO?

QQCI.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HUTE.TO.

What is the main difference between QQCI.TO and HUTE.TO?

QQCI.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while HUTE.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: CI and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for QQCI.TO and 0.50% for HUTE.TO.