PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQCE.TO vs. ZPAY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQCE.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) and BMO Premium Yield ETF (ZPAY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQCE.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQCE.TO
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
-5.29%16.43%36.67%44.13%-25.37%5.14%
ZPAY.TO
BMO Premium Yield ETF
-1.58%2.61%16.94%16.87%-6.33%4.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCE.TO achieves a -5.29% return, which is significantly lower than ZPAY.TO's -1.58% return.


QQCE.TO

1D
3.45%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
-5.29%
6M
-4.07%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
23.60%
5Y*
10Y*

ZPAY.TO

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
-1.58%
6M
-3.39%
1Y
2.16%
3Y*
8.17%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQCE.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCE.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPAY.TO's 0.73% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQCE.TO vs. ZPAY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCE.TO
QQCE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPAY.TO
ZPAY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ZPAY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPAY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPAY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPAY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPAY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQCE.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) and BMO Premium Yield ETF (ZPAY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQCE.TOZPAY.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

0.17

+0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

0.33

+1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.05

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

0.18

+1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.48

0.48

+4.00

QQCE.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the ZPAY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCE.TO and ZPAY.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQCE.TOZPAY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.17

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.45

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between QQCE.TO and ZPAY.TO is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQCE.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQCE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than ZPAY.TO's 7.81% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
QQCE.TO
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
0.34%0.32%0.38%0.44%0.79%0.14%0.00%
ZPAY.TO
BMO Premium Yield ETF
7.81%7.46%5.81%6.40%7.00%6.10%5.42%

Drawdowns

QQCE.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCE.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.86%, which is greater than ZPAY.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCE.TO and ZPAY.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQCE.TOZPAY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.86%

-14.89%

-15.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-8.88%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.17%

-5.71%

-4.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-2.66%

-6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

3.28%

+1.40%

Volatility

QQCE.TO vs. ZPAY.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to BMO Premium Yield ETF (ZPAY.TO) at 3.11%. This indicates that QQCE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPAY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQCE.TOZPAY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

3.11%

+3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

6.70%

+6.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.51%

12.60%

+10.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

10.48%

+10.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.82%

43.80%

-22.98%