QQCE.TO vs. TQQQ.TO
QQCE.TO (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) and TQQQ.TO (BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQCE.TO tracks the NASDAQ-100 ESG Index while TQQQ.TO tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
QQCE.TO vs. TQQQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQCE.TO achieves a 23.30% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ.TO's 61.21% return.
QQCE.TO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 14.10%
- YTD
- 23.30%
- 6M
- 19.99%
- 1Y
- 45.87%
- 3Y*
- 30.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 32.95%
- YTD
- 61.21%
- 6M
- 52.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQCE.TO vs. TQQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQCE.TO Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 23.30% | 18.42% |
TQQQ.TO BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF | 61.21% | 41.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQCE.TO and TQQQ.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQCE.TO vs. TQQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQCE.TO
TQQQ.TO
QQCE.TO vs. TQQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) and BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TQQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQCE.TO | TQQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.80 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.60 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQCE.TO | TQQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 2.86 | -1.94 |
Drawdowns
QQCE.TO vs. TQQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQCE.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.86%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ.TO drawdown of -38.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCE.TO and TQQQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQCE.TO | TQQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.86% | -38.15% | +7.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.92% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -8.46% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | — | — |
Volatility
QQCE.TO vs. TQQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQCE.TO | TQQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.47% | 47.75% | -31.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 47.75% | -27.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 47.75% | -27.04% |
Dividends
QQCE.TO vs. TQQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQCE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while TQQQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQCE.TO Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.14% |
TQQQ.TO BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQCE.TO and TQQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQCE.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 ESG Index, while TQQQ.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X.
Find the right allocation for QQCE.TO and TQQQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer