QQCE.TO vs. QQCC.TO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QQCE.TO (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) and QQCC.TO (Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Over the past 3 years, QQCE.TO returned 30.75%/yr vs 23.56%/yr for QQCC.TO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQCE.TO charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for QQCC.TO.

Performance

QQCE.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCE.TO achieves a 23.11% return, which is significantly higher than QQCC.TO's 16.94% return.

QQCE.TO

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 13.61%
• YTD: 23.11%
• 6M: 19.83%
• 1Y: 47.16%
• 3Y*: 30.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQCC.TO

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 10.18%
• YTD: 16.94%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 35.05%
• 3Y*: 23.56%
• 5Y*: 15.67%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQCE.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQCE.TO Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	23.11%	16.43%	36.67%	44.13%	-25.37%	5.14%
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	16.94%	11.64%	33.48%	35.99%	-8.51%	0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QQCE.TO and QQCC.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021	0.59

Over the past year, QQCE.TO and QQCC.TO have become more correlated (0.89) than their long-term average of 0.59, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

QQCE.TO vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCE.TO

QQCE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 76
QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QQCE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
QQCE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QQCE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QQCE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

QQCC.TO

QQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
QQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQCE.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQCE.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	2.76	+0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	3.72	-0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.50	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	4.32	-0.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.17	16.04	-4.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQCE.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCE.TO and QQCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQCE.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88	2.76	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.00	+0.92

Drawdowns

QQCE.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCE.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.86%, smaller than the maximum QQCC.TO drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCE.TO and QQCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQCE.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.86%	-36.70%	+5.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.16%	-8.15%	-5.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.05%	-22.24%	-0.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.71%	-8.37%	-0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	2.19%	+2.10%

Volatility

QQCE.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) at 3.75%. This indicates that QQCE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQCE.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	3.75%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.66%	10.03%	+2.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.47%	12.78%	+3.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.72%	17.58%	+3.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.72%	17.29%	+3.43%

QQCE.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCE.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than QQCC.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQCE.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQCE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than QQCC.TO's 10.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	10.48%	11.27%	9.89%	11.85%	11.04%	5.15%	5.84%	6.31%	7.90%	6.01%	6.73%	8.89%
QQCE.TO Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	0.26%	0.32%	0.38%	0.44%	0.79%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQCE.TO and QQCC.TO in my portfolio?

QQCE.TO and QQCC.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQCE.TO or QQCC.TO?

On fees, QQCE.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQCE.TO or QQCC.TO?

QQCE.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for QQCC.TO.

What is the main difference between QQCE.TO and QQCC.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for QQCE.TO and 0.65% for QQCC.TO.