QQCE.TO vs. ICAE.TO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

QQCE.TO (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) and ICAE.TO (Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQCE.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 ESG Index, while ICAE.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQCE.TO returned 29.10%/yr vs 16.16%/yr for ICAE.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQCE.TO charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for ICAE.TO.

Performance

QQCE.TO vs. ICAE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) and Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF (ICAE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCE.TO achieves a 20.51% return, which is significantly higher than ICAE.TO's 17.91% return.

QQCE.TO

• 1D: -1.90%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 16.93%
• YTD: 20.51%
• 1Y: 35.09%
• 3Y*: 29.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ICAE.TO

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 4.07%
• 6M: 16.71%
• YTD: 17.91%
• 1Y: 17.47%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQCE.TO vs. ICAE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QQCE.TO Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	20.51%	16.43%	36.67%	35.09%
ICAE.TO Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF	17.91%	10.02%	17.62%	5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between QQCE.TO and ICAE.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2023	0.16

Return for Risk

QQCE.TO vs. ICAE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCE.TO

QQCE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 67
QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
QQCE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QQCE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QQCE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
QQCE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

ICAE.TO

ICAE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 32
ICAE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
ICAE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
ICAE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
ICAE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
ICAE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQCE.TO vs. ICAE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) and Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF (ICAE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQCE.TO	ICAE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	0.89	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	1.15	+1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.28	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	1.06	+1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.01	2.13	+5.88

QQCE.TO vs. ICAE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the ICAE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCE.TO and ICAE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQCE.TO vs. ICAE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCE.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.86%, which is greater than ICAE.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCE.TO and ICAE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQCE.TO	ICAE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.86%	-16.49%	-14.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.16%	-16.49%	+3.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.05%	-16.49%	-6.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.84%	-1.42%	-2.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.56%	-3.53%	-5.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.41%	8.23%	-3.82%

Volatility

QQCE.TO vs. ICAE.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.60% compared to Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF (ICAE.TO) at 2.14%. This indicates that QQCE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICAE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQCE.TO	ICAE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.60%	2.14%	+6.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.89%	7.94%	+7.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.28%	19.78%	-0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.03%	15.99%	+5.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.03%	15.99%	+5.04%

QQCE.TO vs. ICAE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCE.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than ICAE.TO's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQCE.TO vs. ICAE.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQCE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than ICAE.TO's 2.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ICAE.TO Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF	2.72%	3.29%	3.33%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%
QQCE.TO Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	0.26%	0.32%	0.38%	0.44%	0.79%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQCE.TO and ICAE.TO in my portfolio?

QQCE.TO and ICAE.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQCE.TO or ICAE.TO?

On fees, QQCE.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQCE.TO or ICAE.TO?

QQCE.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for ICAE.TO.

What is the main difference between QQCE.TO and ICAE.TO?

QQCE.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ICAE.TO is Dividend. QQCE.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 ESG Index, while ICAE.TO tracks S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for QQCE.TO and 0.23% for ICAE.TO.