QQC.TO vs. QQQQ.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQC.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) and QQQQ.TO (Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from Invesco and Mackenzie respectively. Both are passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQC.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QQQQ.TO.

Performance

QQC.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQC.TO achieves a 22.65% return, which is significantly higher than QQQQ.TO's 21.51% return.

QQC.TO

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 12.93%
• YTD: 22.65%
• 6M: 19.07%
• 1Y: 43.34%
• 3Y*: 29.99%
• 5Y*: 21.56%
• 10Y*: —

QQQQ.TO

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 13.62%
• YTD: 21.51%
• 6M: 18.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	22.65%	6.80%
QQQQ.TO Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	21.51%	7.64%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC.TO and QQQQ.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025	0.52

Return for Risk

QQC.TO vs. QQQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC.TO

QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 76
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) and Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQC.TO	QQQQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.38	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQC.TO	QQQQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	2.87	-1.85

Drawdowns

QQC.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.81%, which is greater than QQQQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC.TO and QQQQ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQC.TO	QQQQ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.81%	-11.95%	-19.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.06%	-3.38%	-4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQC.TO	QQQQ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.58%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.33%	17.07%	-1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.85%	17.07%	+3.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.82%	17.07%	+3.75%

QQC.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQC.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQC.TO vs. QQQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than QQQQ.TO's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	0.31%	0.39%	0.45%	0.54%	0.91%	0.56%
QQQQ.TO Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	0.09%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQC.TO and QQQQ.TO in my portfolio?

QQC.TO and QQQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQC.TO or QQQQ.TO?

On fees, QQC.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQC.TO or QQQQ.TO?

QQC.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQQQ.TO.

What is the main difference between QQC.TO and QQQQ.TO?

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC.TO and 0.25% for QQQQ.TO.