QQC-F.TO vs. XUU-U.TO
QQC-F.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) and XUU-U.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQC-F.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while XUU-U.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQC-F.TO returned 13.33%/yr vs 14.50%/yr for XUU-U.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQC-F.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XUU-U.TO.
Performance
QQC-F.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQC-F.TO is traded in CAD, while XUU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 12.04% return, which is significantly lower than XUU-U.TO's 13.00% return.
QQC-F.TO
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- YTD
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 22.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- 19.30%
XUU-U.TO
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- YTD
- 13.00%
- 1Y
- 22.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- —
QQC-F.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 12.04% | 18.79% | 24.19% | 52.81% | -33.42% | 27.15% | 45.04% | 10.14% |
XUU-U.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 13.00% | 11.40% | 33.28% | 23.90% | -15.09% | 28.35% | 16.34% | 6.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQC-F.TO and XUU-U.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, QQC-F.TO and XUU-U.TO have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQC-F.TO vs. XUU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQC-F.TO
XUU-U.TO
QQC-F.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQC-F.TO | XUU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.33 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 2.54 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 9.59 | -3.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQC-F.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than XUU-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and XUU-U.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQC-F.TO | XUU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.03% | -24.00% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.98% | -9.04% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.76% | -20.43% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.03% | -22.44% | -13.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -2.08% | -4.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -4.80% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 2.38% | +1.38% |
Volatility
QQC-F.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) at 3.30%. This indicates that QQC-F.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQC-F.TO | XUU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 3.30% | +4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.34% | 10.50% | +4.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.61% | 13.01% | +5.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 17.25% | +5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.69% | 17.97% | +4.72% |
QQC-F.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQC-F.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XUU-U.TO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQC-F.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQC-F.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than XUU-U.TO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 0.34% | 0.39% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.89% | 0.66% | 0.49% | 0.64% | 0.77% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.76% |
XUU-U.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 1.05% | 1.15% | 1.05% | 1.14% | 1.32% | 0.97% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQC-F.TO and XUU-U.TO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUU-U.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUU-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQC-F.TO.
QQC-F.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XUU-U.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. QQC-F.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XUU-U.TO tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC-F.TO and 0.08% for XUU-U.TO.
Find the right allocation for QQC-F.TO and XUU-U.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer