PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQC-F.TO vs. QQCI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQC-F.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than QQCI.TO's 16.01% return.


QQC-F.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
10.71%
YTD
19.79%
6M
17.83%
1Y
38.43%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
16.33%
10Y*
20.30%

QQCI.TO

1D
0.35%
1M
9.28%
YTD
16.01%
6M
14.16%
1Y
34.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC-F.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
19.79%18.41%6.03%
QQCI.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF
16.01%12.64%11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and QQCI.TO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2024

0.76

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and QQCI.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQC-F.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQC-F.TO
QQCI.TO

Technology

53.8%
53.8%

Communication Services

15.8%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
7.7%

Healthcare

4.2%
4.2%

Industrials

2.8%
2.8%

Utilities

1.4%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.1%

Energy

0.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

QQC-F.TO
53.8%
QQCI.TO
53.8%

Communication Services

QQC-F.TO
15.8%
QQCI.TO
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QQC-F.TO
12.3%
QQCI.TO
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

QQC-F.TO
7.7%
QQCI.TO
7.7%

Healthcare

QQC-F.TO
4.2%
QQCI.TO
4.2%

Industrials

QQC-F.TO
2.8%
QQCI.TO
2.8%

Utilities

QQC-F.TO
1.4%
QQCI.TO
1.4%

Basic Materials

QQC-F.TO
1.1%
QQCI.TO
1.1%

Energy

QQC-F.TO
0.6%
QQCI.TO
0.6%

Financial Services

QQC-F.TO
0.2%
QQCI.TO
0.2%

Real Estate

QQC-F.TO
0.1%
QQCI.TO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQC-F.TO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC-F.TO
QQC-F.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

QQCI.TO
QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC-F.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQC-F.TOQQCI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.49

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

4.61

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

16.33

-5.42

QQC-F.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQC-F.TO and QQCI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQC-F.TOQQCI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.71

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.52

-0.60

Drawdowns

QQC-F.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than QQCI.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and QQCI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQC-F.TOQQCI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.03%

-18.95%

-17.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.16%

-7.62%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

0.00%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-3.10%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

2.14%

+1.39%

Volatility

QQC-F.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) at 3.32%. This indicates that QQC-F.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQC-F.TOQQCI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

3.32%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.08%

9.39%

+2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

12.98%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.45%

15.55%

+6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

15.55%

+6.99%

Dividends

QQC-F.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQC-F.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
0.00%0.09%0.50%0.57%0.89%0.66%0.49%0.64%0.77%0.66%0.81%0.76%
QQCI.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF
8.60%9.34%3.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQC-F.TO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQC-F.TO and QQCI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer