PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly lower than QDAY.NEO's 31.76% return.


QQC-F.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
10.71%
YTD
19.79%
6M
17.83%
1Y
38.43%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
16.33%
10Y*
20.30%

QDAY.NEO

1D
0.41%
1M
18.94%
YTD
31.76%
6M
28.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and QDAY.NEO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC-F.TO
QQC-F.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

QDAY.NEO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQC-F.TOQDAY.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQC-F.TOQDAY.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

2.63

-1.71

Drawdowns

QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than QDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -19.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and QDAY.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQC-F.TOQDAY.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.03%

-19.44%

-16.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

0.00%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-5.23%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

Volatility

QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQC-F.TOQDAY.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

22.72%

-6.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.45%

22.72%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

22.72%

-0.18%

QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQC-F.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QDAY.NEO's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison

QQC-F.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDAY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDAY.NEO
Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF
13.90%8.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
0.00%0.09%0.50%0.57%0.89%0.66%0.49%0.64%0.77%0.66%0.81%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQC-F.TO and QDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQC-F.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQC-F.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.

QQC-F.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QDAY.NEO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC-F.TO and 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQC-F.TO and QDAY.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer