QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO
QQC-F.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) and QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQC-F.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while QDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. QQC-F.TO is passively managed, while QDAY.NEO is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQC-F.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for QDAY.NEO.
Performance
QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly lower than QDAY.NEO's 31.76% return.
QQC-F.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 10.71%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 38.43%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- 16.33%
- 10Y*
- 20.30%
QDAY.NEO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 18.94%
- YTD
- 31.76%
- 6M
- 28.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 19.79% | 9.90% |
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF | 31.76% | 14.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQC-F.TO and QDAY.NEO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
QQC-F.TO
QDAY.NEO
QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQC-F.TO | QDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQC-F.TO | QDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 2.63 | -1.71 |
Drawdowns
QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than QDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -19.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and QDAY.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQC-F.TO | QDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.03% | -19.44% | -16.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | 0.00% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -5.23% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | — | — |
Volatility
QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQC-F.TO | QDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 22.72% | -6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 22.72% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 22.72% | -0.18% |
QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQC-F.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QDAY.NEO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQC-F.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison
QQC-F.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDAY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF | 13.90% | 8.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.89% | 0.66% | 0.49% | 0.64% | 0.77% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQC-F.TO and QDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQC-F.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQC-F.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.
QQC-F.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QDAY.NEO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC-F.TO and 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.
Find the right allocation for QQC-F.TO and QDAY.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer