QQC-F.TO vs. NVDA

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

QQC-F.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, QQC-F.TO returned 20.16%/yr vs 69.39%/yr for NVDA. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

QQC-F.TO vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

QQC-F.TO is traded in CAD, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 12.39% return. Over the past 10 years, QQC-F.TO has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 20.16%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.39% annualized return.

QQC-F.TO

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 16.04%
• 6M: 16.23%
• 1Y: 34.78%
• 3Y*: 24.55%
• 5Y*: 15.31%
• 10Y*: 20.16%

NVDA

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -7.18%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 19.06%
• 1Y: 48.72%
• 3Y*: 73.69%
• 5Y*: 67.91%
• 10Y*: 69.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC-F.TO vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	16.04%	18.79%	24.19%	52.81%	-33.42%	27.15%	45.04%	37.63%	-2.23%	31.94%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	12.39%	32.57%	194.22%	230.95%	-47.11%	125.37%	117.02%	69.65%	-25.00%	69.67%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and NVDA is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012	0.62

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QQC-F.TO vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC-F.TO

QQC-F.TO Risk / Return Rank: 64
QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
QQC-F.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QQC-F.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
QQC-F.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QQC-F.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 75
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC-F.TO vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQC-F.TO	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	1.30	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	1.86	+0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.23	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	2.17	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.27	4.91	+4.36

QQC-F.TO vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQC-F.TO and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQC-F.TO vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -80.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQC-F.TO	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.03%	-80.18%	+44.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.98%	-20.81%	+7.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.76%	-38.45%	+15.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.03%	-63.60%	+27.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.03%	-63.60%	+27.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.44%	-11.16%	+7.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.49%	-28.49%	+23.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	9.17%	-5.60%

Volatility

QQC-F.TO vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) is 7.16%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.40%. This indicates that QQC-F.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQC-F.TO	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.16%	13.40%	-6.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.58%	26.51%	-12.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.01%	34.74%	-17.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.60%	52.13%	-29.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.62%	50.48%	-27.86%

Dividends

QQC-F.TO vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

QQC-F.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	0.34%	0.39%	0.50%	0.57%	0.89%	0.66%	0.49%	0.64%	0.77%	0.66%	0.81%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQC-F.TO and NVDA in my portfolio?

QQC-F.TO and NVDA have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.