QQC-F.TO vs. HISU-U.TO
QQC-F.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) and HISU-U.TO (Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QQC-F.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while HISU-U.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Evolve. QQC-F.TO is passively managed, while HISU-U.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQC-F.TO returned 26.30%/yr vs 4.56%/yr for HISU-U.TO. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. QQC-F.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HISU-U.TO.
Performance
QQC-F.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQC-F.TO is traded in CAD, while HISU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HISU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 19.18% return, which is significantly higher than HISU-U.TO's 2.44% return.
QQC-F.TO
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 8.60%
- YTD
- 19.18%
- 6M
- 17.61%
- 1Y
- 37.09%
- 3Y*
- 26.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.21%
- 10Y*
- 20.19%
HISU-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQC-F.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 19.18% | 18.41% | 24.19% | 52.81% | -11.76% |
HISU-U.TO Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund | 2.44% | -1.75% | 12.72% | 1.60% | 4.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQC-F.TO and HISU-U.TO is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQC-F.TO vs. HISU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQC-F.TO
HISU-U.TO
QQC-F.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQC-F.TO | HISU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.18 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 1.13 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 2.94 | +7.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQC-F.TO | HISU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 0.99 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.85 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
QQC-F.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than HISU-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and HISU-U.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQC-F.TO | HISU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.03% | -5.49% | -30.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.16% | -4.01% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.76% | -5.49% | -17.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.58% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -1.78% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 1.54% | +1.99% |
Volatility
QQC-F.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO) at 0.86%. This indicates that QQC-F.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HISU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQC-F.TO | HISU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 0.86% | +3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.08% | 3.45% | +8.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 4.59% | +11.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 5.94% | +16.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 5.94% | +16.60% |
QQC-F.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQC-F.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HISU-U.TO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQC-F.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQC-F.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HISU-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HISU-U.TO Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund | 2.74% | 2.93% | 3.70% | 3.85% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.89% | 0.66% | 0.49% | 0.64% | 0.77% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQC-F.TO and HISU-U.TO have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HISU-U.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HISU-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQC-F.TO.
QQC-F.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while HISU-U.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC-F.TO and 0.15% for HISU-U.TO.
Find the right allocation for QQC-F.TO and HISU-U.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer