QQC-F.TO vs. ETSX.TO
QQC-F.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) and ETSX.TO (Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund CAD Unhedged) are both exchange-traded funds - QQC-F.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ETSX.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQC-F.TO returned 26.56%/yr vs 19.01%/yr for ETSX.TO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQC-F.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ETSX.TO.
Performance
QQC-F.TO vs. ETSX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than ETSX.TO's 7.49% return.
QQC-F.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 10.71%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 38.43%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- 16.33%
- 10Y*
- 20.30%
ETSX.TO
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 26.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQC-F.TO vs. ETSX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 19.79% | 18.41% | 24.19% | 46.57% |
ETSX.TO Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund CAD Unhedged | 7.49% | 25.93% | 18.50% | 6.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQC-F.TO and ETSX.TO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023 | 0.43 |
The correlation between QQC-F.TO and ETSX.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQC-F.TO vs. ETSX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQC-F.TO
ETSX.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQC-F.TO
ETSX.TO
Communication Services
QQC-F.TO
ETSX.TO
Consumer Cyclical
QQC-F.TO
ETSX.TO
Consumer Defensive
QQC-F.TO
ETSX.TO
Healthcare
QQC-F.TO
ETSX.TO
-
Industrials
QQC-F.TO
ETSX.TO
Utilities
QQC-F.TO
ETSX.TO
Basic Materials
QQC-F.TO
ETSX.TO
Energy
QQC-F.TO
ETSX.TO
Financial Services
QQC-F.TO
ETSX.TO
Real Estate
QQC-F.TO
ETSX.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQC-F.TO vs. ETSX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQC-F.TO
ETSX.TO
QQC-F.TO vs. ETSX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund CAD Unhedged (ETSX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQC-F.TO | ETSX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.45 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.45 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | 15.85 | -4.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQC-F.TO | ETSX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.43 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.46 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
QQC-F.TO vs. ETSX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than ETSX.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and ETSX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQC-F.TO | ETSX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.03% | -12.23% | -23.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.16% | -7.72% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.76% | -12.23% | -10.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.37% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -1.67% | -3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 1.68% | +1.85% |
Volatility
QQC-F.TO vs. ETSX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund CAD Unhedged (ETSX.TO) at 2.70%. This indicates that QQC-F.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETSX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQC-F.TO | ETSX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 2.70% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.08% | 8.78% | +3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 11.01% | +4.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 11.71% | +10.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 11.71% | +10.83% |
QQC-F.TO vs. ETSX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQC-F.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ETSX.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQC-F.TO vs. ETSX.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQC-F.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETSX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETSX.TO Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund CAD Unhedged | 9.19% | 9.39% | 9.20% | 9.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.89% | 0.66% | 0.49% | 0.64% | 0.77% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQC-F.TO and ETSX.TO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQC-F.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQC-F.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ETSX.TO.
QQC-F.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ETSX.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. QQC-F.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ETSX.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC-F.TO and 0.45% for ETSX.TO.
Find the right allocation for QQC-F.TO and ETSX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer