QQ.L vs. AKO-A
QQ.L (QinetiQ Group plc) and AKO-A (Embotelladora Andina S.A) are both stocks. QQ.L operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while AKO-A operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, QQ.L returned 9.80%/yr vs 10.21%/yr for AKO-A. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QQ.L vs. AKO-A - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQ.L is traded in GBp, while AKO-A is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AKO-A values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQ.L achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than AKO-A's 0.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QQ.L having a 9.80% annualized return and AKO-A not far ahead at 10.21%.
QQ.L
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- 15.85%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- -4.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
AKO-A
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 21.83%
- 3Y*
- 27.99%
- 5Y*
- 25.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
QQ.L vs. AKO-A - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQ.L QinetiQ Group plc | 7.91% | 8.34% | 37.22% | -11.50% | 37.15% | -15.08% | -8.68% | 27.80% | 27.13% | -9.87% |
AKO-A Embotelladora Andina S.A | 0.13% | 57.83% | 24.53% | 25.67% | 40.14% | -14.76% | -11.70% | -17.38% | -21.57% | 21.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQ.L and AKO-A is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
QQ.L:
£2.47B
AKO-A:
$3.30B
QQ.L:
-£0.14
AKO-A:
CLP 1.95K
QQ.L:
0.67
AKO-A:
0.00
QQ.L:
4.47
AKO-A:
0.00
QQ.L:
£3.85B
AKO-A:
CLP 3.42T
QQ.L:
£372.10M
AKO-A:
CLP 1.34T
QQ.L:
£533.20M
AKO-A:
CLP 620.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQ.L vs. AKO-A — Risk / Return Rank
QQ.L
AKO-A
QQ.L vs. AKO-A - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) and Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQ.L | AKO-A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.13 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 1.03 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.35 | 2.45 | -2.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQ.L vs. AKO-A - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQ.L drawdown since its inception was -55.68%, smaller than the maximum AKO-A drawdown of -60.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQ.L and AKO-A.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQ.L | AKO-A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.68% | -60.86% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.90% | -21.29% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.77% | -21.29% | -10.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.77% | -21.29% | -10.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.09% | -59.17% | +21.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.68% | -13.10% | -2.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.92% | -24.41% | +7.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.77% | 8.93% | +3.84% |
Volatility
QQ.L vs. AKO-A - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) is 11.18%, while Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A) has a volatility of 18.40%. This indicates that QQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AKO-A based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQ.L | AKO-A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.18% | 18.40% | -7.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.10% | 42.03% | -19.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.81% | 53.07% | -22.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.21% | 42.49% | -11.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 42.15% | -13.27% |
Dividends
QQ.L vs. AKO-A - Dividend Comparison
QQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than AKO-A's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKO-A Embotelladora Andina S.A | 4.59% | 5.24% | 6.95% | 9.27% | 17.81% | 8.12% | 5.74% | 4.72% | 4.16% | 2.63% | 2.34% | 2.50% |
QQ.L QinetiQ Group plc | 1.91% | 2.00% | 1.99% | 2.49% | 2.04% | 2.59% | 2.06% | 1.84% | 2.20% | 2.60% | 2.17% | 1.99% |
Financials
QQ.L vs. AKO-A - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QinetiQ Group plc and Embotelladora Andina S.A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QQ.L vs. AKO-A - Profitability Comparison
QQ.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a gross profit of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
AKO-A - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a gross profit of 393.07B and revenue of 958.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.
QQ.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported an operating income of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.
AKO-A - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported an operating income of 147.46B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
QQ.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a net income of 69.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
AKO-A - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a net income of 102.93B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QQ.L and AKO-A have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QQ.L and AKO-A
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer