QPUX vs. VRTL
QPUX (Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF) and VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QPUX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for VRTL.
Performance
QPUX vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QPUX achieves a -71.23% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 136.37% return.
QPUX
- 1D
- -13.62%
- 1M
- -55.16%
- 6M
- -76.32%
- YTD
- -71.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRTL
- 1D
- -7.20%
- 1M
- -10.39%
- 6M
- 111.36%
- YTD
- 136.37%
- 1Y
- 223.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QPUX vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | -71.23% | -55.09% |
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 136.37% | 12.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between QPUX and VRTL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPUX vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank
QPUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VRTL
QPUX vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QPUX | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.75 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QPUX vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPUX drawdown since its inception was -94.73%, which is greater than VRTL's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPUX and VRTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPUX | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.73% | -60.58% | -34.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.29% | -45.73% | -48.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.47% | -16.99% | -53.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.32% | — |
Volatility
QPUX vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPUX | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 49.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 95.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.75% | 123.17% | +75.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 198.75% | 127.51% | +71.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 198.75% | 127.51% | +71.24% |
QPUX vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPUX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPUX vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison
Neither QPUX nor VRTL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QPUX and VRTL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QPUX is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QPUX is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.
QPUX and VRTL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QPUX and 1.50% for VRTL.
Find the right allocation for QPUX and VRTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer