QPUX vs. FLSP
QPUX (Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF) and FLSP (Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QPUX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while FLSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. QPUX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FLSP.
Performance
QPUX vs. FLSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QPUX achieves a -42.38% return, which is significantly lower than FLSP's 2.12% return.
QPUX
- 1D
- -16.04%
- 1M
- -43.68%
- YTD
- -42.38%
- 6M
- -52.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLSP
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 16.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.38%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- —
QPUX vs. FLSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | -42.38% | -55.09% |
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF | 2.12% | 9.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between QPUX and FLSP is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPUX vs. FLSP — Risk / Return Rank
QPUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLSP
QPUX vs. FLSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QPUX | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QPUX vs. FLSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPUX drawdown since its inception was -94.73%, which is greater than FLSP's maximum drawdown of -22.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPUX and FLSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPUX | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.73% | -22.75% | -71.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.57% | -1.12% | -87.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.08% | -6.25% | -62.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.35% | — |
Volatility
QPUX vs. FLSP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPUX | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 201.87% | 9.05% | +192.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 201.87% | 13.35% | +188.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 201.87% | 13.48% | +188.39% |
QPUX vs. FLSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPUX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSP's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPUX vs. FLSP - Dividend Comparison
QPUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF | 2.60% | 2.65% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 2.18% | 1.19% | 8.08% |
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QPUX and FLSP have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLSP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLSP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QPUX.
FLSP has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.00% for QPUX.
QPUX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FLSP is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QPUX and 0.65% for FLSP.
Find the right allocation for QPUX and FLSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer