QPUX vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QPUX (Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QPUX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. QPUX is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. QPUX charges 1.29%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

QPUX vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QPUX achieves a -42.38% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 769.73% return.

QPUX

• 1D: -16.04%
• 1M: -43.68%
• YTD: -42.38%
• 6M: -52.28%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: -18.59%
• 1M: -3.58%
• YTD: 769.73%
• 6M: 723.00%
• 1Y: 1,296.25%
• 3Y*: 109.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QPUX vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF	-42.38%	-55.09%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	769.73%	63.68%

Correlation

The correlation between QPUX and BWET is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

QPUX vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QPUX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QPUX vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QPUX	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	13.17	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.71	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.83	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	42.79	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	136.82	—

Drawdowns

QPUX vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QPUX drawdown since its inception was -94.73%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPUX and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	QPUX	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.73%	-56.90%	-37.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-30.64%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.57%	-23.05%	-65.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.08%	-23.76%	-45.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QPUX	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	32.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	91.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	201.87%	100.33%	+101.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	201.87%	71.24%	+130.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	201.87%	71.24%	+130.63%

QPUX vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPUX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QPUX vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

Neither QPUX nor BWET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QPUX and BWET in my portfolio?

QPUX and BWET have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QPUX or BWET?

On fees, QPUX is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QPUX or BWET?

QPUX is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QPUX or BWET?

QPUX and BWET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QPUX and BWET?

QPUX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QPUX and 3.50% for BWET.