PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QPFF vs. QCON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QPFF vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QPFF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCON

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QPFF vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison


QPFF vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QPFF
QCON

Financial Services

51.6%
7.9%

Utilities

5.5%
1.5%

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Communication Services

3.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.1%

-

Industrials

1.2%
1.0%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

-

Financial Services

QPFF
51.6%
QCON
7.9%

Utilities

QPFF
5.5%
QCON
1.5%

Real Estate

QPFF
4.1%
QCON

-

Communication Services

QPFF
3.6%
QCON

-

Consumer Cyclical

QPFF
2.1%
QCON

-

Industrials

QPFF
1.2%
QCON
1.0%

Basic Materials

QPFF
0.3%
QCON

-

Consumer Defensive

QPFF

-

QCON

-

Energy

QPFF

-

QCON

-

Healthcare

QPFF

-

QCON

-

Technology

QPFF

-

QCON

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QPFF vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QPFF vs. QCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QPFF vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QPFF drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPFF and QCON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QPFFQCONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Volatility

QPFF vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QPFFQCONDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

QPFF vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPFF has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

QPFF vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

Neither QPFF nor QCON has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QCON is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QCON is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for QPFF.

QPFF and QCON have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

QPFF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while QCON is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for QPFF and 0.32% for QCON.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QPFF and QCON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer