PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QOZ.AX vs. F100.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QOZ.AX vs. F100.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX) and Betashares FTSE 100 ETF (F100.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QOZ.AX achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than F100.AX's 2.19% return.


QOZ.AX

1D
-0.90%
1M
-1.89%
6M
2.99%
YTD
4.61%
1Y
14.31%
3Y*
11.55%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
8.87%

F100.AX

1D
0.40%
1M
2.19%
6M
0.99%
YTD
2.19%
1Y
11.24%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QOZ.AX vs. F100.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QOZ.AX
BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF
4.61%14.57%8.09%8.49%3.17%17.17%-0.13%0.65%
F100.AX
Betashares FTSE 100 ETF
2.19%25.77%14.12%11.00%-1.20%21.76%-16.05%7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QOZ.AX and F100.AX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2019

0.55

The correlation between QOZ.AX and F100.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QOZ.AX vs. F100.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QOZ.AX
QOZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

F100.AX
F100.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
F100.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
F100.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
F100.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
F100.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
F100.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QOZ.AX vs. F100.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX) and Betashares FTSE 100 ETF (F100.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QOZ.AXF100.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.17

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.23

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

3.70

+0.40

QOZ.AX vs. F100.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the F100.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QOZ.AX and F100.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QOZ.AX vs. F100.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QOZ.AX drawdown since its inception was -37.05%, which is greater than F100.AX's maximum drawdown of -31.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QOZ.AX and F100.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QOZ.AXF100.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.05%

-31.78%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-8.92%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.67%

-8.92%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.87%

-19.00%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.86%

-1.05%

-2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-5.90%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

3.00%

+0.45%

Volatility

QOZ.AX vs. F100.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX) is 2.54%, while Betashares FTSE 100 ETF (F100.AX) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that QOZ.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than F100.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QOZ.AXF100.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

3.07%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

9.63%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

11.45%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

12.72%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.68%

14.90%

-0.22%

QOZ.AX vs. F100.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QOZ.AX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than F100.AX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

QOZ.AX vs. F100.AX - Dividend Comparison

QOZ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than F100.AX's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
F100.AX
Betashares FTSE 100 ETF
2.24%3.09%1.91%1.57%1.62%2.13%2.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QOZ.AX
BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF
2.28%2.07%2.42%2.75%4.97%3.96%3.30%6.45%4.28%1.82%3.62%6.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


QOZ.AX and F100.AX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QOZ.AX is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QOZ.AX is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for F100.AX.

QOZ.AX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while F100.AX is Global Equities. QOZ.AX tracks FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index, while F100.AX tracks FTSE 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QOZ.AX and 0.45% for F100.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QOZ.AX and F100.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer